Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] drawoverhead: new microbenchmark

2017-05-22 Thread Brian Paul
LGTM. Reviewed-by: Brian Paul On 04/30/2017 05:58 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: From: Marek Olšák Based on a benchmark from mesa/demos, but rewritten and extended. It's a benchmark expected to be run separately, not a piglit test. So why piglit? Because it's

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] drawoverhead: new microbenchmark

2017-05-22 Thread Brian Paul
On 05/15/2017 08:05 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: Marek Olšák writes: From: Marek Olšák Based on a benchmark from mesa/demos, but rewritten and extended. It's a benchmark expected to be

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] drawoverhead: new microbenchmark

2017-05-15 Thread Marek Olšák
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: > Marek Olšák writes: > >> From: Marek Olšák >> >> Based on a benchmark from mesa/demos, but rewritten and extended. >> It's a benchmark expected to be run separately, not a piglit test.

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] drawoverhead: new microbenchmark

2017-05-14 Thread Timothy Arceri
On 12/05/17 05:49, Eric Anholt wrote: Marek Olšák writes: From: Marek Olšák Based on a benchmark from mesa/demos, but rewritten and extended. It's a benchmark expected to be run separately, not a piglit test. So why piglit? Because it's a good

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] drawoverhead: new microbenchmark

2017-05-11 Thread Eric Anholt
Marek Olšák writes: > From: Marek Olšák > > Based on a benchmark from mesa/demos, but rewritten and extended. > It's a benchmark expected to be run separately, not a piglit test. > So why piglit? Because it's a good framework for writing apps like this. >

[Piglit] [PATCH] drawoverhead: new microbenchmark

2017-04-30 Thread Marek Olšák
From: Marek Olšák Based on a benchmark from mesa/demos, but rewritten and extended. It's a benchmark expected to be run separately, not a piglit test. So why piglit? Because it's a good framework for writing apps like this. mesa_glthread won't show an improvement here,