Re: Pike 8.0 release 1116

2022-04-28 Thread David Estopa
Hi, William. Thaks for your response. I appreciated it. I'm triing to reproduce the problem with a more basic program, and some constants autogenerated, but we obtain another diferent error or limitation on the tests. It seems that there is a limit when you define more than 64K constants

Re: Pike 8.0 release 1116

2022-04-27 Thread H William Welliver
Just a quick update: I wrote a (basically empty) program that included 20 empty files and had no problems on 8.0.1116. So there must be something more to it. If you can find a minimal test case, we might have better luck. Bill > On Apr 26, 2022, at 11:01 AM, David Estopa wrote: > > Hello,

Re: Pike 8.0 release 1116

2022-04-27 Thread william
Hi David- I'm not aware of a limitation... is it possible you have a circular reference somewhere? Do you suspect an overall size limitation, or do you think it's because of the number of includes? Removing the content from one or more of the files might give an indication of one vs the

Pike 8.0 release 1116

2022-04-26 Thread David Estopa
Hello, Friends of Pike! On Pike 8.0 1116,   have anybody experienced similar malloc error trying to include several .h files into a program?   malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted)   corrupted size vs. prev_size My program includes several .h to define several languages constants. If I