Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>I was then wondering if it is being used successfully anywhere already?
I now know more about the Shuffler code than I ever wanted to know
(obviously).
However, armed with that knowledge I am reasonably surprised that anyone
managed to use it in the old state
>I don't use it myself in Pike 8.0, I use it in Pike 8.1 now.
>But, in the interest of stabilty I can offer to port the fixes from
>8.1 to 8.0 (which, I hope, should be reasonably straightforward, I haven't
>looked yet).
>
>Should I?
I am still seeing quite a few testsuite failures, like:
Doing
>:-). Well, I don't think these problems touch the Shuffler.
Oh I see, I thought FakePike would be using Shuffler...
Tobias S. Josefowitz @ Pike developers forum wrote:
>I am still seeing quite a few testsuite failures, like:
>Doing tests in modules/_Stdio/testsuite (181 tests, pid 12880)
>Socket test
>Child: Copying 19712 bytes of data on 14 fake pipes Failed to read
>complete data, errno=0, "Success".
FakeFile is supposed to emulate a regular file.
This would mean that whenever you reach the end of the file/string
you are reading, you are supposed to signal a close callback because eof
has been reached.
I.e. the close callback on FakeFile should therefore not need to wait
for an actual close
Tobias S. Josefowitz @ Pike developers forum wrote:
>>:-). Well, I don't think these problems touch the Shuffler.
>Oh I see, I thought FakePike would be using Shuffler...
No, indeed.
I fixed the FakePipe issue. It passes all tests, AFAICS.
With regard to the Shuffler: the Pike 8.0 shuffler
