I got all of them on list 3
John
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Siemens jaramec...@yahoo.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:47 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Remember that pinhole swap...
Just wondering... what is the average return rate for
a
oooh, also very, very nice, pintoids. keep going nice work.
Wendy Garfinkel
I just got back from a trip - just want to say that I love your underwater
image. very nice!
Wendy Garfinkel
Hey Jeff: Thanks for the comments. The photos were taken on the Washington
coast. Funny story: That day, on the path down to the beach, we met two
women who were leaving in disgust. They said that they'd just witnessed a
nude photo session on the beach. (Hey! I thought I was the only one with
that
I want to build an 8x10 pinhole for doing abstract macro photography. I
was thinking about 300mm for the focal length, being the standard for
8x10 lens cameras.
But then i thought 2:1 or higher magnification with a lens camera would
have a bellow extension of 600mm and more.
So would
If you enjoy fine-art landscapes, seascapes, and artistic nudes, check out
Pinhole Photographs by Steve Foote. Visitors to the site can download free
computer wallpaper or order signed prints direct from the artist.
- Original Message -
From: pinholeren...@netscape.net
all the above . usualy asa 100
Undoubtedly, your pinhole exposures would fall into the nightmares of
reciprocity failure. Each film (emulsion type and speed combined) will need
different corrections (Tmax100 would need different
For those who like to looks at scans:
http://hiddenworld.net/pinhole/index.php?cmd=maxstart=0pic=little-river-ca
nyon.jpg
Little River Canyon, early spring of 2001
http://hiddenworld.net/pinhole/index.php?cmd=maxstart=12pic=viningsbuildin
g.jpg
A building near my work in Vinings, ourside
Hello!
But then i thought 2:1 or higher magnification with a lens camera would
have a bellow extension of 600mm and more.
So would a 300mm pinhole 8x10 camera for macro work be kind of a wide
angle?
As a pinhole doesn't have an inherent focal length, you can shoot a 2:1
macro with any
advance a black sheet 6 inches for 20 seconds exposure 16 times for a total
exposure fo 320 seconds. The sheet should advance in front of a inexpensive
4foot by 8 foot insulation foam board painted with 4 inch lines of different
colors. even though some black might try to register- the colored
Hi Ballard,
As John Farrias said, There is no curve to apply to reciprocity. I
couldn't find one single curve that worked for all the times on the chart I
have. I really have no idea what There is no curve to apply to
reciprocity. It is a linear logarithmic function means. If it is a
function,
Great pictures, Marcy! Are these taken in California?
I didn't know you were on this list. Let me say that your junkstore
camera page has been an inspiration for me, an aspiring crappy camera
collector as well as pinholer. Keep up the good work,
Jeff Dilcher
Atlanta, GA
-Original
You wouldn't need more bellows extension, as a pinhole does not need to be
focused like a lens. 300mm is a standard focal length, not wide angle nor
telephoto. You could figure out how large the image would be on the film by
using simmilar triangles. I believe the optimal pinhole for a 12 focal
This makes perfect sense in my head, but it may not make sense written out.
I used this method when i was first starting out with paper negatives and
cardboard box cameras. It really helped to have a photo teacher who gave me
a really good understanding of f/ stops.
I would do a series of tests
14 matches
Mail list logo
