Re: [pinhole-discussion] umm (ortho-litho development)

2002-02-20 Thread Gordon J. Holtslander
Hi: Depends on what you want to do. One of the standard kodak ortho developers in called fineline - mixed as two stock solutions which are combined prior to development. This gives a high contrast negative The developer should give some info on effective film speeds, depends on the light source

[pinhole-discussion] umm (ortho-litho development)

2002-02-20 Thread R Duarte
ummm, sorry.. i also wanted to ask if anyone has sort of a summary of developing techniques for that ortho-litho stuff (eg which chemicals in which dilutions). i wish there was an easier way to search the archives. :-/ thanks again, rob

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Howard Wells
Thank you Adrian, that is the post I remembered. Howard Wells Adrian Joyner wrote: > > Will this copy of an earlier email help: > > Adrian Joyner > Clevedon > England > > Laura > > Excuse me for butting in. I regularlyuse Type 55 at ISO 25 and use the > > following reciprocity corrections: >

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New website

2002-02-20 Thread Michael Young
Leslie I also found it impossible to enlarge the images. the 'hand pointer' appears fine but with no result. Using latest Netscape on Mac. Any thoughts? Michael Message: 4 List-Post: pinhole-discussion@pinhole.com Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 07:43:03 -0800 From: Bob Russman To: pinhole-discussion@p at

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Adrian Joyner
Will this copy of an earlier email help: Adrian Joyner Clevedon England Laura Excuse me for butting in. I regularlyuse Type 55 at ISO 25 and use the following reciprocity corrections: Indicated exposure Correction factor Final exposure 8 seconds 2x 16 seconds 16 seconds 2.5x 40 seconds 32

Re: [pinhole-discussion] ASA for ortho-litho film (again)

2002-02-20 Thread Bill Erickson
Try 5 or 10. Instead of under or over exposure what you get is more or less black areas. it's alsmost a matter of personal taste. - Original Message - From: To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:44 PM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] ASA for ortho-litho film (again) > > Hey everyon

[pinhole-discussion] pinhole site

2002-02-20 Thread James Noel
Thanks for spending the time and effort necessary to provide a very nice site. I really enjoy your images and, as an instructor in photography at a community college, find them esthetically beautiful. As for suggestions re: the site, It would be nice to be able to go from one image to another wi

[pinhole-discussion] ASA for ortho-litho film (again)

2002-02-20 Thread rahji
Hey everyone, I'm sorry, but I've searched the archives all morning - I even downloaded the 18MB file and searched it that way - and I can't find the answers to the question that I asked last year about the ASA of the ortho-litho film that I got from photo warehouse (i think) last spring. They'

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Chris Peregoy
In his book, "Polaroid Land Photography", By Ansel Adams from 1978 he states that; an indicated time of 8 sec should be 16 sec (2X) an indicated time of 16 sec should be 40 sec (2.5x) an indicated time of 32 sec should be 96 sec (3x) an indicated time of 64 sec should be 256 sec (4x) -- -- Chr

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Bill Erickson
My memory of my work with type 55 is that the reciprocity corrections used for other film worked fine with type 55. I exposed for negative, not positive, ASA 25. - Original Message - From: "Markus Birsfelder" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: AW: [pinhole-discussion

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Guy Glorieux
Blush, blush, blush... Guy - Original Message - From: "Markus Birsfelder" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 12:12 PM Subject: AW: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments > I am not sure you refer to this post, but here is what I have saved: > > == > Gu

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Guy Glorieux
> I would appreciate the list also. I just bought a pack of Type 55 for > experimental reasons. > > Tom Miller I'll join on that too. Would there be a way to post that information somewhere that is can be retreived by a lot of people, since I'm sure there are many others than Gordon or Tom looki

AW: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Markus Birsfelder
I am not sure you refer to this post, but here is what I have saved: == Guy, Back in the 1974 Jim Shull published "The Hole Thing", a pinhole photography book which includes a table of reciprocity corrections for enlarging paper used in pinhole cameras. (Apparently he was using Lu

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Tom Miller
Hi Gordy, The last I've done about a Bennett show was talk to David Pamperin a couple of months ago. It was a good long conversation, he listened and seemed interested in the idea of a pinhole show. I've been meaning to send him a follow-up (reminder) letter. Should have done it by now, but bei

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Gordy Emery
Tom, I would like a copy also. I now know what the new museum display will be at the H.H. BENNETT MUSEUM . I think it will bring a lot of people to the museun; so I realy feel we must continue to work on getting the pinhole meet their. Please get me full information as I am working with the p

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Tom Miller
I would appreciate the list also. I just bought a pack of Type 55 for experimental reasons. Tom Miller - Original Message - From: "Howard Wells" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:44 AM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments > Late last year a list member

[pinhole-discussion] Type 55 reciprocity adjustments

2002-02-20 Thread Howard Wells
Late last year a list member published a chart of reciprocity adjustments with Type 55 Polaroid. I printed it out, lost it, and now can't find it in the archives. Some interior work has taken me into uncharted (to me) realms with this wonderful material. Help and thanks. Howard Wells

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New website

2002-02-20 Thread DAlfrey
In a message dated 2/19/02 10:35:45 PM Central Standard Time, wildber...@svn.com.br writes: << Very nice all of your images in your site. Could you share with us informations about what kind of camera you used, as well as type of film and also chosen development and printing processes ? Thank y

Re: [pinhole-discussion] 120 slide film?

2002-02-20 Thread Mike Vande Bunt
No. The slides are much larger; you will need a medium format slode projector. (If it is the original Zero 2000, rather than the 6x9 convertable version, the image area is 6 cm by 6 cm or two and a quarter inches square. The outside dimensions of the mounted slides is slightly larger than that.

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New website

2002-02-20 Thread Mike Vande Bunt
Wow. Very impressive. You put a lot of work into the site and it shows. Mike Vande Bunt lad...@aol.com wrote: I invite all members to take a look at my new pinhole website a provide me with your opinions. It can be found at www.lesliedavisp at ??? Thank you in advance Le

[pinhole-discussion] pinhole website construction

2002-02-20 Thread Gordon J. Holtslander
I've been asked to make very "snazzy" looking web pages that rely heavily upon javascript, however it is also the policy of our University to insure that every web browser - even the oldest and most mediocre can access the same information. To keep everyone happy I put a link at the top of the "ja