Dear All
This is to announce that all my Pinholistic Columns (I prefer the word
essays now) that have been posted at Pinhole Visions have moved to a new
location. Many thanks to Gregg for originally setting them up and hosting
them.
"Edo's Pinhole Esoteric Essays" are now all consolidated at
http
That was my experience, no logo on the final print.
When replying to such a long long thread, please delete the 3262354
irrelevant messages, yahoo sigs, and the tags that the list puts from your
post. Just leave the one that you are specifically replying to. I have
scrolled through many of the m
The logo on Kodak paper makes it unsuitable for using as a negative, in my
experience, which is to bad because the paper is nice and I would love to
suppport an American company.
Mitch
From: George L Smyth
Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject:
I guess it hasn't been improved in ten years, and still won't be ten years from
now.
Cheers -
george
--- D Hill wrote:
>
> Well friends, it's happening again... I don't want to be a Fuji fanatic -
> preferably an evangelist. If you want a good substitution for good-ole
> Tri-X, get a can
Has anyone ever confirmed that the logo on the back affects the image? As
previously stated, when I tried a Kodak paper (it was probably Polycontrast
III) I saw no logo when I contact-printed the negative.
Cheers -
george
--- D Hill wrote:
>
> Another note on papers. I used to use Ilford,
Yes, but can i get it in 4x5 readyload packs for my Polaroid film holder?
Once I went TMAX readyload, I have never looked back...
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, D Hill wrote:
>
> Well friends, it's happening again... I don't want to be a Fuji fanatic -
> preferably an evangelist. If you want a good
Well friends, it's happening again... I don't want to be a Fuji fanatic -
preferably an evangelist. If you want a good substitution for good-ole Tri-X,
get a can of Fuji Neopan 400. Still the same film it was 10 years ago, and
still the same film 10 years from now.
Thanks for the info Andy,
Kodak Revisions: Due to a change in film base, Kodak has announced that all
TMax, Plus-X and Tri-X films are to be rereleased with revised names and
development times. The new films are replacing the old ones as stock runs
out, and Kodak anticipates the changeover taking place between now and the
e
Another note on papers. I used to use Ilford, but I got cranky at the price
one day so I picked up a box of Mitsubishi Gekko Matte, tried it and liked it -
and It's also great for proofs. It is a wonderful matte surface VC RC paper,
and is quite inexpensive at about $33 for 100 - 8x10. It d
--- Colin Talcroft wrote:
>
> I think the perhaps unusual thing about the OM-2 is
> that it ALWAYS does the off-the-film thing,
> adjusting
> exposure during the exposure if the light changes.
>
> Colin
>
> --- Derek Clarke wrote:
> > Canon use off-the-film flash metering in "TTL"
> mode.
> >
I think the perhaps unusual thing about the OM-2 is
that it ALWAYS does the off-the-film thing, adjusting
exposure during the exposure if the light changes.
Colin
--- Derek Clarke wrote:
> Canon use off-the-film flash metering in "TTL" mode.
> These days they offer
> E-TTL which use preflash a
11 matches
Mail list logo
