The table that I have used for most of my 100 iso film is published in
Eric Renners book, Pinhole Photography: Rediscovering a Historic
Technique. I don't have it in front of me, and can't remember off the
top of my head. As soon as I find it I'll let you know.
James
On Wednesday, July 17, 2
I've used Fuji Sensia 100 in my 35mm (with pinhole) camera with no problems.
I used it outdoors in good light. Exposures were less than 10 seconds if I
remember correctly. I simply used the camera metering through the pinhole
for exposure. Maybe adding a bit of exposure since the meter was gett
Tom,
I forgot to mention the tungsten balanced 64t which is also a Provia
family member. Most of my several minute long exposures have been
indoors so the color balance was quite warm because of household
tungsten lighting. It is my impression that the film goes slightly
magenta at some point. I'm
> Howard Wells wrote:
>
> The Fuji Provias both seem to have good latitude and good reciprocity
> characteristics. Not as much as negative films, of course, but very
> usable for pinhole in my opinion. I use them for pinhole in 35, 120 and
> 4x5.
>
> I have not used the Fuji Sensia series and wo
Chris wrote:
> While waiting for an appointment I pulled out my alt books for a little
> reading. In Christopher James's book page 136 he says that a range of
> 1.8 is needed for Mike Ware's New Cyanotype formula. He say's "Mike
> advises extending from base+fog (0.2) to a D-maz of 2.0 or more. T
> Hello Shannon, HP5 by it's nature has a fair bit of base density. If you
> want/need a very thin base, you may be better off with another film. Using
> it at 3200 is almost certainly going to harm your low end (shadow)
> separation! I use it at 160 for alt. Also remember that with pinhole you (I)
Shannon Stoney wrote:
I am shooting HP5+ in the 8x10 format in a pinhole camera for cyanotypes. I
am having trouble getting the highlights dense enough. I am up to a 20
minute development time now, and still the highlights only have a density of
1.71. I would like a density range of about 1.6,
Hello Shannon, HP5 by it's nature has a fair bit of base density. If you
want/need a very thin base, you may be better off with another film. Using
it at 3200 is almost certainly going to harm your low end (shadow)
separation! I use it at 160 for alt. Also remember that with pinhole you (I)
get a b
Chris wrote:
> How are you reading the densities? I sometimes see students of mine make
> mistakes and zero out our old densitometer to straight white light from
> the reading arm.
The directions that came with my densitometer said to zero it out exactly
this way.
--shannon
Shannon Stoney wrote:
I am shooting HP5+ in the 8x10 format in a pinhole camera for cyanotypes. I
am having trouble getting the highlights dense enough. I am up to a 20
minute development time now, and still the highlights only have a density of
1.71. I would like a density range of about 1.6,
James,
Have you got any reciprocity tables for these Fuji films to share with us ?
Ricardo
- Original Message -
From: "James Kellar"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity table for ectachrome E100S
> I'm not sure about Ektacrome E100S,
I tinkered with this problem for a while before concluding that there seemed
to be no way to increase contrast for HP5. I tried one recommendation for
that film, using HC110 at 1:20 instead of 1:31, but I couldn't see a
difference. With TMAx you have the quick and dirty option of increased
agitatio
12 matches
Mail list logo
