Thanks. I think Zen is the proper approach to very long exposures. The gods
seem to know.
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity failure of paper negs.
> Bill,
> I don't know if I can give you spe
Bill,
I don't know if I can give you specifics, but my longest successful exposure
has been 47 days. I tried an exposure in a basement area for ten days and the
result was too faint so i put the date I began the next exposure and kind of
forgot about my camera for a while. When I remembered it,
ay.org/2001/photo_63.html
:)
Gregg
- Original Message -
From: Guy Glorieux
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity failure of paper negs.
Bill Erickson wrote:
I'm planning an image of a dark
I get the message. More is better, but don't forget to go to bed.
- Original Message -
From: Guy Glorieux
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity failure of paper negs.
Bill Eri
" reciprocity nightmare ' great stuff , thank you...regards mickey
a happy life is made up of many happy moments
Bill Erickson wrote:
> I'm planning an image of a dark corner in an old building. The
> exposure calculates out to about five days with a paper negative. At
> what exposure time does one begin to run into reciprocity failure with
> paper, and what are the parameters?
Bill,
I wrote a little pie
I'm planning an image of a dark corner in an old building. The exposure
calculates out to about five days with a paper negative. At what exposure time
does one begin to run into reciprocity failure with paper, and what are the
parameters?
