Re: [pinhole-discussion] that old reciprocity failure question again

2002-08-09 Thread Shannon Stoney
Guillermo wrote: > Reciprocity corrections as well as development adjustments are > just suggested starting values, pretty much as the ISO speed of the films is > (i.e.: 4x5 TRI-X works for me as EI-200, and not as ISO320 as Kodak suggest). > From that perspective, both Kodak and the

Re: [pinhole-discussion] that old reciprocity failure question again

2002-08-08 Thread G.Penate
Shannon, Reciprocity corrections as well as development adjustments are just suggested starting values, pretty much as the ISO speed of the films is (i.e.: 4x5 TRI-X works for me as EI-200, and not as ISO320 as Kodak suggest). >From that perspective, both Kodak and the mentioned book

Re: [pinhole-discussion] that old reciprocity failure question again

2002-08-08 Thread George L Smyth
--- Shannon Stoney wrote: > Hi. I have two reciprocity failure charts. One is from Kodak and the other > is from Steve Simmons' book, Using the View Camera. They give very > different adjusted times for Tri X, when you get to very long exposures. > For example, if the metered time is 30 seconds,

[pinhole-discussion] that old reciprocity failure question again

2002-08-07 Thread Shannon Stoney
Hi. I have two reciprocity failure charts. One is from Kodak and the other is from Steve Simmons' book, Using the View Camera. They give very different adjusted times for Tri X, when you get to very long exposures. For example, if the metered time is 30 seconds, Kodak says to expose for 200 secon