- Original Message -
From: James
you might take a took at this url, the history and how to of paper
negatives, including info on william mortenson's special techniques:
http://www.photography.about.com/library/weekly/aa051302a.htm
James Luckett
James,
Many thanks for this very
-discussion] re: paper negative
Has anyone ever confirmed that the logo on the back affects the image? As
previously stated, when I tried a Kodak paper (it was probably
Polycontrast
III) I saw no logo when I contact-printed the negative.
Cheers -
george
at ???
Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] re: paper negative
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 09:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Has anyone ever confirmed that the logo on the back affects the image? As
previously stated, when I tried a Kodak paper (it was probably Polycontrast
III) I saw no logo when I contact-printed
Has anyone ever confirmed that the logo on the back affects the image? As
previously stated, when I tried a Kodak paper (it was probably Polycontrast
III) I saw no logo when I contact-printed the negative.
Cheers -
george
--- D Hill zopp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Another note on papers. I
confirmed...Ilford is logo free...
andy
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of James
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 7:40 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] re: paper
