Control: block -1 by 830478
Hi,
I attempted to fix this, and it seems to be a simple missing
Build-Depends. However, I discovered that the dependency installs
its source in the wrong directory.
The fix is thus blocked on #830478
Best,
nicoo
___
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 830478
Bug #829237 [src:systemd-docker] systemd-docker: FTBFS: main.go:19:2: cannot
find package "github.com/docker/docker/pkg/mflag"
829237 was not blocked by any bugs.
829237 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 829237: 830478
--
I've just pushed a patch for this to the package repository on alioth.
Tim.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 820249 +pending
Bug #820249 [src:golang-github-miekg-pkcs11] Please switch from softhsm to
softhsm2
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
820249:
Source: golang-github-thejerf-suture
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: acbuild
Version: 0.3.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: gopacket
Version: 1.1.11-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 9:59:32 PM AEST Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> >> What's the current status? Is there technical progress compared to what was
> >> discussed in April? The freeze is coming really close and we can't support
> >> the status quo for stretch.
> >
> >
On 8 July 2016 at 14:29, Chris Lamb wrote:
> src/github.com/docker/swarm/api/flusher.go:8:2: cannot find package
> "github.com/docker/docker/pkg/ioutils" in any of:
This sounds like another case of #830478, which should've been fixed
with src:docker.io 1.11.2~ds1-2 (uploaded
Source: docker-swarm
Version: 1.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
docker-swarm fails to build from source in
Tim,
"golang-github-jonboulle-clockwork" that you prepared have neither "Provides"
field nor transitional package for "golang-clockwork-dev".
Now when the latter is removed many packages ended up broken.
Here is one example:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [pkg-go]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Smirnov
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: block 829461 by -1
Package name: golang-github-rogpeppe-fastuuid
Version: 0.0~git20150106
Upstream Author: Roger
golang-github-dghubble-sling_1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
golang-github-dghubble-sling_1.0-1.dsc
golang-github-dghubble-sling_1.0.orig.tar.gz
golang-github-dghubble-sling_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz
golang-github-dghubble-sling-dev_1.0-1_all.deb
binary:golang-github-rogpeppe-fastuuid-dev is NEW.
source:golang-github-rogpeppe-fastuuid is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so
golang-github-cznic-ql_1.0.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
golang-github-cznic-ql_1.0.4-1.dsc
golang-github-cznic-ql_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz
golang-github-cznic-ql_1.0.4-1.debian.tar.xz
golang-github-cznic-ql-dev_1.0.4-1_all.deb
Greetings,
On 7 Jul 2016, at 12:40 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>
> On 06/07/16 20:59, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>
>> What's the current status? Is there technical progress compared to what was
>> discussed in April? The freeze is coming really close and we can't support
>> the status quo
Source: golang-google-grpc
Version: 0.0~git20160517.0.a22b6611-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant
Source: golang-github-bmizerany-assert
Version: 0.0~git20120716-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant
Source: golang-github-cloudfoundry-gosigar
Version: 0.0~git20150402.27.3ed7c74-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
Source: golang-github-coreos-go-oidc
Version: 0.0~git20151022.0.e9c0807-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160707 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
20 matches
Mail list logo