Jeffrey,
On 29/01/17 21:09, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> As a stopgap, you might consider adding a small swapfile and setting
> swapiness to a low value.
I am talking about buildds, and a package prevented from migrating to
testing because of this :)
> Nearly every ARM gadget I had was suffering OOM
> Sadly, it turns out armhf fails to build due to one test taking a bit
> too much memory[1], and there is an RC bug open for that: #852959[2].
>
> So now I don't know what to do, except asking for removal of prometheus
> from armhf.
As a stopgap, you might consider adding a small swapfile and set
Hello ARM porters,
I am the maintainer for the prometheus suite, which is in testing. Last
week, just before the deadline I prepared and uploaded a new upstream
release (which I even tested in an armel porterbox to be sure).
Sadly, it turns out armhf fails to build due to one test taking a bit
to
