❦ 6 juin 2017 13:50 -0400, Tong Sun :
>> > Would it be a better option to have golang-1.x-go packages to link Go
>> > executables into PATH, instead of golang-go?
>>
>> In the past, users were able to choose their Go version with the
>> "update-alternatives" mechanism. However, this doesn't wor
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Vincent Bernat - ber...@debian.org wrote:
> ❦ 4 juin 2017 18:27 -0400, pkgoyq@neverbox.com :
>
> >> > Does Debian have such arrangement as well (no Go executables in PATH)
> >> > having installed a (minimum) golang-1.x-go package?
> >>
> >> You need to instal
❦ 4 juin 2017 18:27 -0400, pkgoyq@neverbox.com :
>> > Does Debian have such arrangement as well (no Go executables in PATH)
>> > having installed a (minimum) golang-1.x-go package?
>>
>> You need to install golang-go package. Currently, this will use Go
>> 1.7.
>
>
> Would it be a better opt
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Vincent Bernat - ber...@debian.org wrote:
> > Does Debian have such arrangement as well (no Go executables in PATH)
> > having installed a (minimum) golang-1.x-go package?
>
> You need to install golang-go package. Currently, this will use Go
> 1.7.
Would it be a
❦ 3 juin 2017 11:36 -0400, pkgoyq@neverbox.com :
> I just installed golang-1.8-go to my Ubuntu 17.04 and noticed that I don't
> have go in PATH:
>
> $ apt-cache policy golang-1.8-go
> golang-1.8-go:
> Installed: 1.8.1-1ubuntu1
> Candidate: 1.8.1-1ubuntu1
> Version table:
> *** 1.8.1-1
