Re: [proj] 01/01: proj-data is arch all

Hi Bas, On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 11:13:27PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 05/09/2014 11:01 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: proj-data is arch all This is not entirely true. The package contains the datumgrids, these are architecture specific. debian/TODO documents this: The

Re: proj_4.8.0-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 09:20:31PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: . [ Andreas Tille ] * proj-data is arch all Argh, wrong! If nothing changed at upstream level, binary data need to be generated per architecture due to endianess. The right fix would be making proj-data all and adding

Re: [gdal] branch pristine-tar updated (3b8f65d - de3852e)

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:31:15PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: I've seen different tarballs for the same upstream version on snapshot.d.o, but AFAIK ftp-master rejects source uploads when the checksum and/or size doesn't match the orig.tar.gz previously uploaded. Maybe just importing

Bug#747587: postgis: [INTL:it] Italian translation of debconf messages

Source: postgis Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Hi. Please find attached the Italian translation of postgis debconf messages proofread by the Italian localization team. Please include it in your next upload. Thanks, Beatrice # Italian translation of postgis debconf templates # Copyright

[proj] branch master updated (644495d - 7daeff2)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a change to branch master in repository proj. from 644495d proj-data is arch all new cc3d66a proj-data is arch any because of architecture specific datumgrids. new 7daeff2 Set

[proj] 01/02: proj-data is arch any because of architecture specific datumgrids.

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a commit to branch master in repository proj. commit cc3d66ac11b220e6d9d36a0dc7d6dc1ba6732067 Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sat May 10 01:49:25 2014 +0200 proj-data is arch any

Re: [proj] 01/01: proj-data is arch all

On 05/10/2014 08:23 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Bas, On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 11:13:27PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 05/09/2014 11:01 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: proj-data is arch all This is not entirely true. The package contains the datumgrids, these are architecture

Bug#747595: RFS: proj/4.8.0-4

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package proj Package name: proj Version : 4.8.0-4 Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com URL : http://trac.osgeo.org/proj/ License : MIT Section

libgdal-grass_1.11.0-1~exp1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental, experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 14:43:12 +0200 Source: libgdal-grass Binary: libgdal1-1.11.0-grass Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.11.0-1~exp1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GIS Project

[gdal] 02/04: Imported Upstream version 1.11.0+dfsg1

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a commit to branch experimental in repository gdal. commit 74305c09a10600937308e808e7163412374fb6d4 Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sat May 10 12:21:07 2014 +0200 Imported Upstream

[gdal] branch upstream updated (97db454 - 74305c0)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a change to branch upstream in repository gdal. from 97db454 Restore deleted .gitignore new 74305c0 Imported Upstream version 1.11.0+dfsg1 The 1 revisions listed above as new are entirely

[gdal] branch experimental updated (28e2992 - 65c9375)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a change to branch experimental in repository gdal. from 28e2992 Fix ftbfs on arm64 and ppc64el. new 681c661 Update symbols for: amd64, armel, armhf, i386, mipsel, powerpc s390x.

[gdal] annotated tag upstream/1.11.0+dfsg1 created (now af9444a)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a change to annotated tag upstream/1.11.0+dfsg1 in repository gdal. at af9444a (tag) tagging 74305c09a10600937308e808e7163412374fb6d4 (commit) replaces upstream/1.10.0 tagged by Bas

[gdal] 01/01: pristine-tar data for gdal_1.11.0+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a commit to branch pristine-tar in repository gdal. commit dd3e66c25f9a12c93ae1b06eb315d462dda631bc Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sat May 10 12:21:17 2014 +0200 pristine-tar data for

[gdal] branch pristine-tar updated (04a8d11 - dd3e66c)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a change to branch pristine-tar in repository gdal. from 04a8d11 pristine-tar data for gdal_1.11.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz new dd3e66c pristine-tar data for gdal_1.11.0+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz The 1

[gdal] 03/04: Merge tag 'upstream/1.11.0+dfsg1' into experimental

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a commit to branch experimental in repository gdal. commit f8bbe65987149d738f2e6a1695278098b8911ca4 Merge: 681c661 74305c0 Author: Bas Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl Date: Sat May 10 12:21:17 2014 +0200

[gdal] tag upstream/1.11.0+dfsg deleted (was 97db454)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a change to tag upstream/1.11.0+dfsg in repository gdal. *** WARNING: tag upstream/1.11.0+dfsg was deleted! *** was 97db454 Restore deleted .gitignore The revisions that were on this tag are

[gdal] tag upstream/1.11.0+dfsg created (now 51fa511)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. sebastic-guest pushed a change to tag upstream/1.11.0+dfsg in repository gdal. at 51fa511 (commit) No new revisions were added by this update. -- Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on

Re: [gdal] branch pristine-tar updated (3b8f65d - de3852e)

On 05/10/2014 09:55 AM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:31:15PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Maybe just importing the fixed tarball as upstream version 1.11.0+dfsg+1? Unfortunately we need to introduce a new ad hoc upstream version such as that you suggested.

Re: [proj] 01/01: proj-data is arch all

Hi, On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:40:23AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Sorry for my stupid intervention. However, if the files are not arch independent, they should not end up in /usr/share but rather /usr/lib. Agreed, but this is not something I want to fix now. I looked into this

Re: [proj] 01/01: proj-data is arch all

On 05/10/2014 11:48 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:40:23AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Sorry for my stupid intervention. However, if the files are not arch independent, they should not end up in /usr/share but rather /usr/lib. Agreed, but this is not something I

Re: [proj] 01/01: proj-data is arch all

Hi Bas, On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:23:05AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: So can you explain how it is organised that the correct files for the correct arch will end up in /usr/share? I really think that it would be sensible to move the arch dependant files to /usr/lib and for

Re: [proj] 01/01: proj-data is arch all

On 05/11/2014 12:44 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:23:05AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: So can you explain how it is organised that the correct files for the correct arch will end up in /usr/share? I really think that it would be sensible to move the arch dependant

利鲁医疗器械有限公司

Ò·þÉϵÄÍ©ÓÍ×Õ£¬¿ÉÓö¹¸¯Ôü²ÁÏ´£¬È»ºóÓÃÇåˮƯ¾»¡£ ¡Ç ±¾µ¥Î»¿É°ì£º‡ø µØ¡¶ºÌƒ¶¡·¡Æ·¢¡þƯ ¨€ÓÐÐèÇëÁªÏµ…e¡ÓÀîÉú £±36£±3092639 £Ñ£üQ £±92697£±89 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org