Now I installed gij 4.1 additionally. I couldn't remove gij 4.3. Now I still
get the missing icon messages but then no window opens, the starting process
aborted and I was back at the shell prompt.
I think josm should be moved to contrib if one needs the Java RE from Sun.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
> found 456089 3.0.0-3
Bug#456089: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes
Bug marked as found in version 3.0.0-3.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
To all maintainers of packages that have dependencies on libxerces27
or libxerces28:
If you do not have a build dependency on libxerces27-dev or
libxerces28-dev, then please disregard this false positive.
Otherwise, read on.
I have begun a transition to a new organization for the xerces
packages
Author: frankie
Date: 2008-04-07 11:37:42 + (Mon, 07 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 1501
Added:
packages/gdal/trunk/debian/patches/max.dpatch
Modified:
packages/gdal/trunk/debian/changelog
packages/gdal/trunk/debian/control
packages/gdal/trunk/debian/patches/00list
Log:
Fixating FTBS and
geos_3.0.0-3.1_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
geos_3.0.0-3.1.dsc
geos_3.0.0-3.1.diff.gz
libgeos-doc_3.0.0-3.1_all.deb
libgeos-dev_3.0.0-3.1_ia64.deb
libgeos-c1_3.0.0-3.1_ia64.deb
libgeos-3.0.0_3.0.0-3.1_ia64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian que
Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:02:41 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456089: fixed in geos 3.0.0-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #456089,
regarding FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Accepted:
geos_3.0.0-3.1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/geos/geos_3.0.0-3.1.diff.gz
geos_3.0.0-3.1.dsc
to pool/main/g/geos/geos_3.0.0-3.1.dsc
libgeos-3.0.0_3.0.0-3.1_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g/geos/libgeos-3.0.0_3.0.0-3.1_ia64.deb
libgeos-c1_3.0.0-3.1_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g/geos/libgeos-c1_3.0.0-3.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 474415 + pending
Bug#474415: gdal - FTBFS: error: macro "max" passed 3 arguments, but takes just
2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Author: frankie
Date: 2008-04-07 15:07:09 + (Mon, 07 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 1502
Added:
packages/gdal/tags/1.5.1-2/
Log:
[svn-buildpackage] Tagging gdal (1.5.1-2)
Copied: packages/gdal/tags/1.5.1-2 (from rev 1501, packages/gdal/trunk)
___
Pkg-
Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#474415: fixed in gdal 1.5.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #474415,
regarding gdal - FTBFS: error: macro "max" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
to be marked as done.
This means that
All'incirca Mon, 7 Apr 2008 00:49:26 +0200, Andreas Putzo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sembrerebbe aver scritto:
> On Apr 06 23:55, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> > (gij-4.1 and jamvm). I think we should make the package depend only
> > on those, and not on the generic java2-runtime.
>
> This wouldn't wor
Hi,
On Apr 07 10:19, Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
> Now I installed gij 4.1 additionally. I couldn't remove gij 4.3. Now I still
> get the missing icon messages but then no window opens, the starting process
> aborted and I was back at the shell prompt.
Josm should tell you what java cmd it is us
Package: geos
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: gdal
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 is
Package: osm2pgsql
Version: 0.50.20071211-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2
Author: nd-guest
Date: 2008-04-07 21:03:38 + (Mon, 07 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 1503
Added:
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/master.xml
Modified:
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/rules
Log:
Add a master build file that calls selected plugin builds in a subant.
This reduces patching and
Author: nd-guest
Date: 2008-04-07 21:05:08 + (Mon, 07 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 1504
Removed:
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/patches/100_ywms.dpatch
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/patches/10_build.dpatch
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/patches/20_validator.dpatch
packages/
Author: nd-guest
Date: 2008-04-07 21:05:49 + (Mon, 07 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 1505
Added:
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/patches/10_validator.dpatch
Removed:
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/patches/21_validator.dpatch
Modified:
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/patches/00list
Author: nd-guest
Date: 2008-04-07 21:12:55 + (Mon, 07 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 1506
Modified:
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/patches/00list
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/rules
Log:
* Forgot to rename patch in 00list.
* Use correct target in debian/rules.
Modified: packages/josm
Author: nd-guest
Date: 2008-04-07 21:59:08 + (Mon, 07 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 1507
Modified:
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/rules
Log:
debian/rules: only fetch configured plugins in get-orig-source target.
Modified: packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/rules
20 matches
Mail list logo