Bug#757972: osm2pgsql: Transition to postgresql-9.4
On 08/12/2014 10:53 PM, Christoph Berg wrote: > As postgis is also in the Recommends, the extra Recommends: > postgresql-9.4-postgis-2.1 should be redundant and could as well be > removed so osm2pgsql doesn't need to track the PostgreSQL > version. This would be the nicer solution imho. As discussed, the suggestion from postgis has been upgraded to a recommendation. Starting with postgis_2.1.3+dfsg-4 (currently in the NEW queue), it's therefore sufficient to (only) recommend postgis, rather than postgresql-X.Y-postgis. Regards Markus Wanner signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#757972: osm2pgsql: Transition to postgresql-9.4
Hi Christoph, On 08/12/2014 10:53 PM, Christoph Berg wrote: > osm2pgsql recommends postgresql-9.3-postgis-2.1, > please upgrade this dependency. (postgis will likely be updated later > this week.) Will do after postgis is updated. > As postgis is also in the Recommends, the extra Recommends: > postgresql-9.4-postgis-2.1 should be redundant and could as well be > removed so osm2pgsql doesn't need to track the PostgreSQL > version. This would be the nicer solution imho. The postgresql specific dependency has a long history (since #559604 at least). While not ideal, having the Recommends for both postgis (for the executables) and postgresql-9.4-postgis-2.1 (for the shared library) is useful I think as postgis only Suggests postgresql-9.4-postgis-2.1. Providing a virtual postgis-extension package was discussed briefly back in April. That was in the context of TinyOWS which also doesn't need an explicit PostgreSQL version specific dependency. But nothing concrete has come out of this yet. http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-April/019374.html I think the postgis-extension virtual package without a postgres specific version is the way to go for cases like osm2pgsql and tinyows. For now I think we should stick to bumping the postgresql version when the default changes, while acknowledging that this is very suboptimal. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Bug#757972: osm2pgsql: Transition to postgresql-9.4
Package: osm2pgsql Version: 0.84.0-2 Severity: important User: pkg-postgresql-pub...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: migration-94 (This bug is #732415 reloaded.) Jessie will be shipping with postgresql-9.4; postgresql-9.3 will eventually be removed. osm2pgsql recommends postgresql-9.3-postgis-2.1, please upgrade this dependency. (postgis will likely be updated later this week.) As postgis is also in the Recommends, the extra Recommends: postgresql-9.4-postgis-2.1 should be redundant and could as well be removed so osm2pgsql doesn't need to track the PostgreSQL version. This would be the nicer solution imho. Christoph -- c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
