On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:17:12PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
> Can you try libgdal-grass/1.11.1-1~exp1 once more now that the buildds
> are done with gdal?
Done
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-
Hi Andreas,
On 10/25/2014 09:58 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> I've just filed a binnmu bug to have it rebuilt (#766694).
>
> As usual ping me once I should retry the build (even if stuff in
> experimental should not be that ur
Hi Bas,
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be
> > used.
> > -The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflict
On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used.
> -The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed.
> - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:36:19PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
> Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've
> attached my build log for comparison.
--- libgdal-grass_1.11.1-1~exp1_amd64.build 2014-10-24 22:43:29.0
+0200
+++ libgdal-grass_1.11.1
On 10/24/2014 11:34 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> I cannot reproduce this problem with my sid+experimental chroot which is
>>> setup like yours as described in:
>>>
>>> ht
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >>> Unfortunately this packages also suffers f
On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet
>>> build dependency, so it cannot be built at th
Hi Andreas,
On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>
>> It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1
>> build depends on libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.1-1~).
>>
>> Pulling the experimental branch should
Hi Bas
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
> It looks like your experimental branch is outdated, gdal-grass 1.11.1
> build depends on libgdal-dev (>= 1.11.1-1~).
>
> Pulling the experimental branch should suffice to fix this specific issue:
>
> git fetch or
Hi Bas,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 09:10:43PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> [no love for enigmail today]
try mutt ;-)
switched to public discussion anyway.
For very strange reasons I get
0 packages upgraded, 228 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 37.7 MB/115 MB o
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgdal-grass"
Package name: libgdal-grass
Version : 1.11.1-1~exp1
Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam , Radim Blazek
URL : http://www.gdal.org/
License :
12 matches
Mail list logo
