On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 06:24:16AM +, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the
> package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim
> otherwise.
>
Indeed it is not due to dropped tiff/geotiff functions.
Hi,
why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the
package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim
otherwise.
Ansgar
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://
2 matches
Mail list logo