Comments regarding gdal_1.10.0-0~exp1_i386.changes
Hi, why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim otherwise. Ansgar ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: Comments regarding gdal_1.10.0-0~exp1_i386.changes
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 06:24:16AM +, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim otherwise. Indeed it is not due to dropped tiff/geotiff functions. Let me re-upload with the fix. -- Francesco P. Lovergine ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
