Re: gis-remotesensing task
Hi Antonio, On 08/09/2017 08:09 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote: > Il 09/08/2017 19:57, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto: >> On 08/09/2017 07:42 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote: >>> I refreshed a bit the gis-remotsensing task file. >>> >>> Now that a new version of doris is in the archive I would like to >>> restore the entry in the remotsensing task file if it is OK for you. >> >> That was on my TODO list as well, since we're not going ahead with the >> removal of doris. >> > > OK, thanks > >> The adore-doris entry still needs to be updated (repo moved to GitHub >> among others), and may need to be dropped entirely if it's no longer >> desirable. > > ye, I'll do it right now Please update the debian/changelog with your changes. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: gis-remotesensing task
Hi Sebastiaan, Il 09/08/2017 19:57, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto: > Hi Antonio, > > On 08/09/2017 07:42 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote: >> I refreshed a bit the gis-remotsensing task file. >> >> Now that a new version of doris is in the archive I would like to >> restore the entry in the remotsensing task file if it is OK for you. > > That was on my TODO list as well, since we're not going ahead with the > removal of doris. > OK, thanks > The adore-doris entry still needs to be updated (repo moved to GitHub > among others), and may need to be dropped entirely if it's no longer > desirable. ye, I'll do it right now >> I also updated the dependency from development package of epr-api: >> libepr-api-dev instead of the transitional package libepr-api2-dev. >> >> IMO we could totally drop libepr-api2-dev as soon as a new version of >> gis-repotesensing and gis-devel are uploaded. > > Despite the "Depends" in the Blends tasks files, there are actually > Recomments in the metapackage that gets build, so the blends package > doesn't have to be uploaded before packages it references are removed. OK so I will go ahead and remove libepr-api2-dev totally. Anyway epr-api has been uploads recently, so probably there is no need to make a new upload right now >> I also noted that git-remotesensing and gis-devel suggest some ossim >> related packages that seems to be no longer in the archive: >> ossim-plugins, ossim-gui, ossim-planet, ossim-planet-qt, >> ossim-package-support >> >> Shall we drop them? > > These are not yet in the archive, and may never actually get there. But > ideally they should, as they are included in OSGeo-Live and should be > packaged properly along with ossim. > > After the move to GitHub OSSIM stopped doing releases for too long, but > they've recently released 2.0.0 for which the packages need to be > updated. Each project now has its own GitHub repository for upstream > sources, instead of needing to repack the ossim tarball. > > This is quite a bit of work for just ossim, let alone the other > packages, and I lack time and motivation to work on the ossim package > more, so this is not progressing noticeably. We need the newer OSSIM for > its support of GEOS 3.6 for which ossim is the biggest blocker, and one > that looked hopeless until recently. > > OSSIM 2.0.0 is likely not supported by OTB yet, so there is no rush to > get the Debian package updated, I'll get to it eventually again. After > which it'll stay in experimental until OTB supports it. OK, thanks kind regards -- Antonio Valentino ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: gis-remotesensing task
Hi Antonio, On 08/09/2017 07:42 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote: > I refreshed a bit the gis-remotsensing task file. > > Now that a new version of doris is in the archive I would like to > restore the entry in the remotsensing task file if it is OK for you. That was on my TODO list as well, since we're not going ahead with the removal of doris. The adore-doris entry still needs to be updated (repo moved to GitHub among others), and may need to be dropped entirely if it's no longer desirable. > I also updated the dependency from development package of epr-api: > libepr-api-dev instead of the transitional package libepr-api2-dev. > > IMO we could totally drop libepr-api2-dev as soon as a new version of > gis-repotesensing and gis-devel are uploaded. Despite the "Depends" in the Blends tasks files, there are actually Recomments in the metapackage that gets build, so the blends package doesn't have to be uploaded before packages it references are removed. > I also noted that git-remotesensing and gis-devel suggest some ossim > related packages that seems to be no longer in the archive: > ossim-plugins, ossim-gui, ossim-planet, ossim-planet-qt, > ossim-package-support > > Shall we drop them? These are not yet in the archive, and may never actually get there. But ideally they should, as they are included in OSGeo-Live and should be packaged properly along with ossim. After the move to GitHub OSSIM stopped doing releases for too long, but they've recently released 2.0.0 for which the packages need to be updated. Each project now has its own GitHub repository for upstream sources, instead of needing to repack the ossim tarball. This is quite a bit of work for just ossim, let alone the other packages, and I lack time and motivation to work on the ossim package more, so this is not progressing noticeably. We need the newer OSSIM for its support of GEOS 3.6 for which ossim is the biggest blocker, and one that looked hopeless until recently. OSSIM 2.0.0 is likely not supported by OTB yet, so there is no rush to get the Debian package updated, I'll get to it eventually again. After which it'll stay in experimental until OTB supports it. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
gis-remotesensing task
Hi Sebastiaan, I refreshed a bit the gis-remotsensing task file. Now that a new version of doris is in the archive I would like to restore the entry in the remotsensing task file if it is OK for you. I also updated the dependency from development package of epr-api: libepr-api-dev instead of the transitional package libepr-api2-dev. IMO we could totally drop libepr-api2-dev as soon as a new version of gis-repotesensing and gis-devel are uploaded. I also noted that git-remotesensing and gis-devel suggest some ossim related packages that seems to be no longer in the archive: ossim-plugins, ossim-gui, ossim-planet, ossim-planet-qt, ossim-package-support Shall we drop them? regards -- Antonio Valentino ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
