Bug#336405: libswt3.1-gtk-java: eclipse3 can't live with azureus

tag 336405 wontfix thanks On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 10:36:41AM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: Package: libswt3.1-gtk-java Severity: normal eclipse3 depends on libswt3.1-gtk-java libswt3.1-gtk-java conflicts libswt-gtk-3.1-java azureus depends on libswt-gtk-3.1-java so, if I install eclipse3, I

Removal of libant1.6-java

Hi all, the end of the ant transition ... There are only two packages - nice forrest - left but they are otherwise currently not buildable so we cannot NMU them just for this transition. As the packages have to be fixed by the maintainer anyway I think there is no reason to wait further with

tomcat5 5.0.30-7 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the tomcat5 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 5.0.30-6 Current version: 5.0.30-7 -- This email is automatically generated. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

Bug#298896: Xlib: sequence lost in reply when running eclipse through lbxproxy

reassign 298896 libgtk2.0-0 thanks This bug is/was a bug in GTK. I reassign to libgtk2.0-0 to let the GTK maintainers know it and close it if fixed. Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at

Re: Removal of libant1.6-java

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:53:51AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: Hi all, the end of the ant transition ... There are only two packages - nice forrest - left but they are otherwise currently not buildable so we cannot NMU them just for this transition. As the packages have to be fixed by

Re: Bugs of libapache2-mod-jk2 package

Hi all, Wolfgang Baer wrote: Hi all, libapache2-mod-jk2 package has been removed from the archive. The open bugs are not for reassigning because mod-jk has a different codebase, configuration ... So the question is (as the package will be still available in sarge) how to properly close the

Re: Removing files from CVS on Alioth

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch a écrit : On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:26:43PM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: Hi, it appears that for the next version of libforms-java, hopefully to be uploaded, certain files in the debian directory are not required anymore (one

Re: Bugs of libapache2-mod-jk2 package

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:41:29AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: Hi all, Wolfgang Baer wrote: Hi all, libapache2-mod-jk2 package has been removed from the archive. The open bugs are not for reassigning because mod-jk has a different codebase, configuration ... So the question is (as the

Re: Removal of libant1.6-java

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wolfgang Baer wrote: [...] So I will request removal of libant1.6-java from the archive. +1 for me. - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1

Processed: Re: Processed: reassign ant bug to jamvm

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 337698 ant Bug#337698: ant: fails with jamvm: Unable to find a javac compiler; Bug reassigned from package `jamvm' to `ant'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: bug confirmation cleanup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 266273 confirmed Bug#266273: java-package: does not build a complete package with J2SDK 1.5 Beta 2. There were no tags set. Bug#272970: make-jpkg prints errors while processing blackdown JDK 1.4.2-rc1 Bug#280707: java-package: building package

Bug#281287: Level of effort and cost of maintenance for this not very feasible

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 281287 confirmed stop The above suggestions definitely reflect that most commenters have not worked on java-package. Maintaining the lists of files to remove, which to leave alone, which to replace with symlinks, etc. across 8 JREs and 8 JDKs

Bug#273151: marked as done (sun-j2sdk1.4debian: update-alternatives does not work?)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:43:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line This element has been superseded and the error is fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#281011: marked as done (java-package: Add support for Blackdown Java 1.4.2 fcs)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:41:01 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Support for this was added some time ago but the bug was not closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: correcting erroneous tag operation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 281287 - confirmed Bug#281287: java-package: remove duplicate files from sun packages There were no tags set. Tags removed: confirmed # wrong tag applied by mistake stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.