Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?

2013-12-30 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 30/12/13 00:48, Rogério Brito wrote: Hi there. Can we have a late Christmas present (or even an New Year's present)? The closure compiler: * has already been removed from testing [1] * has many applications and users that depend/want it * already has patches in the BTS [2] [1]:

Re: Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?

2013-12-30 Thread Thomas Koch
On Monday, December 30, 2013 10:19:53 AM Daniel Pocock wrote: Tony made some commits in Git and it appears he is working to resolve this The rename of the binary package from libclosure-compiler-java - closure-compiler should probably be done now as well to get this out of the way well

Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?

2013-12-30 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 30/12/13 20:35, Thomas Koch wrote: On Monday, December 30, 2013 10:19:53 AM Daniel Pocock wrote: Tony made some commits in Git and it appears he is working to resolve this The rename of the binary package from libclosure-compiler-java - closure-compiler should probably be done now as

Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?

2013-12-30 Thread tony mancill
On 12/30/2013 11:35 AM, Thomas Koch wrote: On Monday, December 30, 2013 10:19:53 AM Daniel Pocock wrote: Tony made some commits in Git and it appears he is working to resolve this The rename of the binary package from libclosure-compiler-java - closure-compiler should probably be done now as

Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?

2013-12-30 Thread tony mancill
On 12/30/2013 11:54 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 30/12/13 20:35, Thomas Koch wrote: On Monday, December 30, 2013 10:19:53 AM Daniel Pocock wrote: Tony made some commits in Git and it appears he is working to resolve this The rename of the binary package from libclosure-compiler-java -

Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?

2013-12-30 Thread Daniel Pocock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 30/12/13 21:03, tony mancill wrote: On 12/30/2013 11:54 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 30/12/13 20:35, Thomas Koch wrote: On Monday, December 30, 2013 10:19:53 AM Daniel Pocock wrote: Tony made some commits in Git and it appears he is

Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?

2013-12-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:03:13 -0800, tony mancill wrote: The rename of the binary package from libclosure-compiler-java - closure-compiler should probably be done now as well to get this out of the way well before the Jessie release. It means that the closure-compiler binary package is

Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?

2013-12-30 Thread tony mancill
On 12/30/2013 03:15 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:03:13 -0800, tony mancill wrote: The rename of the binary package from libclosure-compiler-java - closure-compiler should probably be done now as well to get this out of the way well before the Jessie release. It means

Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?

2013-12-29 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there. Can we have a late Christmas present (or even an New Year's present)? The closure compiler: * has already been removed from testing [1] * has many applications and users that depend/want it * already has patches in the BTS [2] [1]:

Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?

2013-12-29 Thread tony mancill
On 12/29/2013 03:48 PM, Rogério Brito wrote: Hi there. Can we have a late Christmas present (or even an New Year's present)? The closure compiler: * has already been removed from testing [1] * has many applications and users that depend/want it * already has patches in the BTS [2]