Il 18 aprile 2012 09:00, Mathieu Malaterre
ha scritto:
> The explanation in the d/README.source was not clear ? Upstream did
> messed up the licensing. PIRL was /supposed/ to be GPL-2.
It's advisable to put this kind of information directly in the
copyright file, as it's the preferred source to s
Hi Luca,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> several files are licensed under LGPL-2.1.
> Please fix your copyright file.
The explanation in the d/README.source was not clear ? Upstream did
messed up the licensing. PIRL was /supposed/ to be GPL-2.
Anyway after talking with
2 matches
Mail list logo
