Bug#764017: closure-compiler: java.lang.RuntimeException when run on architectures with gcj instead of openjdk (hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any, sparc)

2014-10-04 Thread Johannes Schauer
Package: closure-compiler Version: 20130227+dfsg1-6 Severity: important Hi, suppose, the file "out.js" is empty then the following will happen on architectures without openjdk but gcj (hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any, sparc): $ closure-compiler --js out.js java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.LinkageEr

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (>= 3.0.10~)

2015-06-02 Thread Johannes Schauer
Source: jython Version: 2.5.3-6 Severity: grave Justification: fails to build from source Hi, jython Build-Depends on "libjnr-posix-java (>= 3.0.10~)" but the version of libjnr-posix-java in unstable is only 1.1.8-3. Here is the relevant dose3 output for the build failure: native-architectur

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (>= 3.0.10~)

2015-06-02 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Miguel Landaeta (2015-06-02 21:54:29) > Thanks for the report, we are aware of the issue and we are waiting for > FTPmaster jnr-posix approval to solve this bug and others. thanks for the clarification. Could you next time please hold off on doing such an upload until the reverse dep

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (>= 3.0.10~)

2015-06-03 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting tony mancill (2015-06-03 15:38:02) > However, I'd like to understand how jython figures into the transitive set > (and why - maybe we get it out of the essential set), and how a developer can > determine this. > > [...] > > So is there a tool I can use to view the entire tree to see

Bug#787562: jython FTBFS and jython is uninstallable because of unsatisfied (build-)dependency on libjnr-posix-java (>= 3.0.10~)

2015-06-06 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi Emmanuel, Quoting Emmanuel Bourg (2015-06-04 10:45:57) > Thank you for the detailed analysis Johannes. I removed the libmx4j-java > dependency on jetty, is it any better now? I now noticed that you uploaded src:jetty 6.1.26-5 without a build dependency on libmx4j-java two days ago. So I guess