Bug#735763: svnkit is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-04-05 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 10:43:02AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > > In the meantime I'm going to review your changes to svnkit. Hi again, I just uploaded svnkit 1.8.5+dfsg-1 to DELAYED/5 so it can enter to the archive in combination with updated trilead-ssh2 package. As comment, I had quite lo

Bug#735763: svnkit is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-04-05 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Hi Markus, On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 12:47:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 03.04.2014 15:34, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > > > > I'll review it and upload it to DELAYED/5 if everything is OK. I just uploaded trilead-ssh2 to DELAYED/5. > that would be great. Please go ahead and let me know if t

Bug#735763: svnkit is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-04-05 Thread Markus Koschany
On 03.04.2014 15:34, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:00:35PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> >> I have tested all reverse dependencies of svnkit and they seem to work. >> Only netbeans could not be tested because it's affected by another RC bug. > > Hi Markus, > > Since Matth

Bug#735763: svnkit is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-04-03 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:00:35PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > I have tested all reverse dependencies of svnkit and they seem to work. > Only netbeans could not be tested because it's affected by another RC bug. Hi Markus, Since Matthew tagged his packages with LowThresholdNmu and trilead-

Bug#735763: svnkit is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-04-02 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tags -1 patch On 01.04.2014 14:21, Markus Koschany wrote: [...] > I have to do more smoke testing with svnkit and trilead-ssh2 but will > get back to the list as soon as it's done. Hi, I have tested all reverse dependencies of svnkit and they seem to work. Only netbeans could not be tes

Bug#735763: svnkit is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-04-01 Thread Markus Koschany
On 31.03.2014 22:22, Niels Thykier wrote: [...] > Pro-tip for dealing with these kind of auto-removals: If you CC the bug > in your updates: > * the timer is reset > * we can easier find the latest information about the bug in the bug. >:) > > Particularly, the first one is important as it g

Bug#735763: svnkit is marked for autoremoval from testing

2014-03-31 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-03-31 17:11, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 31.03.2014 15:40, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > [...] >> Help with this is more than welcome, of course. > > I have committed some changes to svnkit two weeks ago and tried to build > the latest upstream release. [1] My impression is that we need a new >