Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 19/01/2017 à 18:49, shirish शिरीष a écrit :

> Look forward to knowing your plans.

Hi Shirish,

As I said last week, I plan to upgrade the openjfx package after the
Stretch release, once the OpenJDK 9 transition starts. But if someone
else (you?) wants to work on this update sooner I'll be happy to sponsor
his work.

Emmanuel Bourg

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

[shirish शिरीष]

in-line :-


On 20/01/2017, Emmanuel Bourg  wrote:
> Le 19/01/2017 à 18:49, shirish शिरीष a écrit :
>
>> Look forward to knowing your plans.
>
> Hi Shirish,

Hi Emmanuel,

> As I said last week, I plan to upgrade the openjfx package after the
> Stretch release, once the OpenJDK 9 transition starts. But if someone
> else (you?) wants to work on this update sooner I'll be happy to sponsor
> his work.

Oops, not a programmer here. I mis-understood. I mis-read that you
would be making a release to experimental soonish.

So I'll wait.

> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

[shirish शिरीष]

at bottom :-

On 11/01/2017, Emmanuel Bourg  wrote:
> Le 11/01/2017 à 11:34, shirish शिरीष a écrit :
>
>> I would suggest to have a new package so people who are on java 8
>> aren't disturbed. While people who want to test out the java 9 and
>> openjfx 9 can look at that direction.
>>
>> As we would be hitting full-freeze tonight, if you do go that way,
>> then hit experimental and see if you can make a release there.
>
> Note that openjdk-9 was mistakenly uploaded to unstable yesterday, it
> should have remained in experimental. The transition to testing will be
> blocked and openjdk-9 won't be part of Stretch, so there is no hurry to
> package OpenJFX 9. Backports for Stretch will be provided though.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>

I was browsing today and don't see it either in experimental or elsewhere.

tracker.debian.org/openjfx

I also viewed the git tracker to see if you might have uploaded it
there and not released but even there it doesn't seem to be IIUC -

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/openjfx.git/log/

Look forward to knowing your plans.

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 11/01/2017 à 11:34, shirish शिरीष a écrit :

> I would suggest to have a new package so people who are on java 8
> aren't disturbed. While people who want to test out the java 9 and
> openjfx 9 can look at that direction.
> 
> As we would be hitting full-freeze tonight, if you do go that way,
> then hit experimental and see if you can make a release there.

Note that openjdk-9 was mistakenly uploaded to unstable yesterday, it
should have remained in experimental. The transition to testing will be
blocked and openjdk-9 won't be part of Stretch, so there is no hurry to
package OpenJFX 9. Backports for Stretch will be provided though.

Emmanuel Bourg

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

[shirish शिरीष]

at bottom :-

On 11/01/2017, Emmanuel Bourg  wrote:
> Le 11/01/2017 à 09:51, shirish शिरीष a écrit :
>
>> Looking forward to see the package which works with version 9.
>>
>> While openjdk 9 would be available around the middle of the year from
>> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/
>>
>> If openjdk 9 is being provided in sid to test out things, it makes
>> sense to also provide openjfx for that as well.
>
> Hi Shirish,
>
> You are right, I plan to upgrade the openjfx package after the Stretch
> release, once the OpenJDK 9 transition starts. I don't know yet if it's
> preferable to upgrade the existing package, or create a new openjfx-9
> package.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>

I would suggest to have a new package so people who are on java 8
aren't disturbed. While people who want to test out the java 9 and
openjfx 9 can look at that direction.

As we would be hitting full-freeze tonight, if you do go that way,
then hit experimental and see if you can make a release there.

-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 11/01/2017 à 09:51, shirish शिरीष a écrit :

> Looking forward to see the package which works with version 9.
> 
> While openjdk 9 would be available around the middle of the year from
> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/
> 
> If openjdk 9 is being provided in sid to test out things, it makes
> sense to also provide openjfx for that as well.

Hi Shirish,

You are right, I plan to upgrade the openjfx package after the Stretch
release, once the OpenJDK 9 transition starts. I don't know yet if it's
preferable to upgrade the existing package, or create a new openjfx-9
package.

Emmanuel Bourg

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

[shirish शिरीष]

Package: openjfx
Version: 8u111-b14-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,
openjfx stamps out at 8u111-b14-1

> aptitude show openjfx

Package: openjfx
Version: 8u111-b14-1
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Priority: optional
Section: java
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Architecture: amd64
Uncompressed Size: 74.8 k
Depends: libopenjfx-java, openjdk-8-jre
Description: JavaFX/OpenJFX 8 - Rich client application platform for Java
 JavaFX/OpenJFX is a set of graphics and media APIs that enables Java
developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client
applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

Homepage: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/openjfx/

whereas openjdk has version 9 as well -

> java -version

openjdk version "9-Debian"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 9-Debian+0-9b151-2)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 9-Debian+0-9b151-2, mixed mode)

> apt-cache policy openjdk-9-jre

openjdk-9-jre:
  Installed: 9~b151-2
  Candidate: 9~b151-2
  Version table:
 *** 9~b151-2 100
100 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Looking forward to see the package which works with version 9.

While openjdk 9 would be available around the middle of the year from
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/

If openjdk 9 is being provided in sid to test out things, it makes
sense to also provide openjfx for that as well.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
(ignored: LC_ALL set to en_IN.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages openjfx depends on:
ii  libopenjfx-java  8u111-b14-1
ii  openjdk-9-jre9~b151-2

openjfx recommends no packages.

openjfx suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
  Regards,
  Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.