FYI: The status of the dojo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.13.0+dfsg1-3
Current version: 1.14.1+dfsg1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
appears in REJECT-section of https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, Pirate Praveen wrote:
I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can help
with categorizing it.
I propose the following,
1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
2. Modules that includes a build step, for example that needs babel,
Hi Bastien,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
- put together packages that belong together; I am not sure here, but
wouldn't it be fine to have just one package node-d3 or node-babel
that contains all corresponding modules (though their different versions
might create
node-tap_12.0.1+ds-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-tap_12.0.1+ds-1.dsc
node-tap_12.0.1+ds.orig-module-bind-obj-methods.tar.gz
node-tap_12.0.1+ds.orig-module-fs-exists-cached.tar.gz
node-tap_12.0.1+ds.orig-module-function-loop.tar.gz
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 05/09/2018 à 23:14, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi everybody,
> >>>
> >>> as you already
Hi Xavier (cc Javascript list),
Please subscribe to the list with all email addresses that you use to
post from.
That way your emails won't get flagged as potential spam, arrive
delayed, and involve time of listmasters to approve it.
If you use multiple email addresses but want to receive
On 09/05/2018 04:38 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>>> Browserify (or webpack) is a static compiler for javascript. I believe
>>> that we must use built-using field in order to be policy compliant.
>>>
[...]
> But I was thinking Built-Using may be used by security team in order
> to trigger
Le 06/09/2018 à 08:05, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> On 06/09/18 10:15 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can
>> help with categorizing it.
>>
>> I propose the following,
>>
>> 1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
>> 2.
Le 06/09/2018 à 08:05, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> On 06/09/18 10:15 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can
>> help with categorizing it.
>>
>> I propose the following,
>>
>> 1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
>> 2.
On 06/09/18 10:15 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can
> help with categorizing it.
>
> I propose the following,
>
> 1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
> 2. Modules that includes a build step, for example that
23 matches
Mail list logo
