FYI: The status of the node-regjsparser source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.4.0+ds-2
Current version: 0.5.1+ds-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
FYI: The status of the node-typescript source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.1.6-1
Current version: 3.2.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
On 11/27/18 1:47 PM, Xavier wrote:
> Maybe a "debian/README.source" might be required for the DD to explain
> his choices (lintian error if missing).
+1
This is good practice anytime we add or subtract from the upstream
tarball. Otherwise it is hard for other team members to help out later.
--
Il 01/12/18 05:39, Debian testing autoremoval watch ha scritto:
> node-rollup-plugin-alias 1.3.1-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
> 2018-12-22
>
> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> 914462: node-rollup-plugin-alias: Fails to build, unsatsifiable Build-Depends
>
>
According to the
Le 01/12/2018 à 12:14, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Xavier (2018-12-01 09:24:54)
>> Le 21/09/2018 à 10:16, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>>> I need bootstrap 4 for gitlab (though only its node counterpart).
>>> I'm thinking of creating a new source package node-bootstrap (if
>>> required
Quoting Xavier (2018-12-01 09:24:54)
> Le 21/09/2018 à 10:16, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> > I need bootstrap 4 for gitlab (though only its node counterpart).
> > I'm thinking of creating a new source package node-bootstrap (if
> > required create libjs-bootstrap4 binary). What is your plan with
Le 21/09/2018 à 10:16, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> Hi David,
>
> I need bootstrap 4 for gitlab (though only its node counterpart). I'm
> thinking of creating a new source package node-bootstrap (if required
> create libjs-bootstrap4 binary). What is your plan with bootstrap 4?
>
> Thanks
>
