Hi,
I needed "@types/react" for node-react-audio-player, as a part of
babel-loader transitions.
I added that in and ran the debian/get-orig-source.sh script.
This downloaded a few new versions, all of which have been updated in
d/control.
My changes have been pushed in the team repo here[1].
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 22:45, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 4:31 pm, Nilesh Patra
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Just like babel we need to do transitions for node-babel-loader as
> > well as praveen mentioned on the list as well. I have updated
> >
Hi,
Just like babel we need to do transitions for node-babel-loader as well as
praveen mentioned on the list as well. I have updated node-babel-loader and
it looks good to me.
I have pushed my changes to my local fork here[1].
Could this please be reviewed, if it looks okay and good to go into
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, 07:38 Pirate Praveen, wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 2:01 am, Nilesh Patra
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, 01:57 Nilesh Patra, wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Node-rollup-plugin-replace has build profiles by the name:
&g
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, 01:57 Nilesh Patra, wrote:
> Hi,
> Node-rollup-plugin-replace has build profiles by the name:
> as can be seen here [1][2]
> This is also the case with a few other node-rollup-plugin-* modules.
>
> While trying to build these with node-babel7, a
Hi,
Node-rollup-plugin-replace has build profiles by the name:
as can be seen here [1][2]
This is also the case with a few other node-rollup-plugin-* modules.
While trying to build these with node-babel7, as a part of babel7
transitions, I noticed that these build profiles lead to
lintian error:
Hi
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020, 06:41 Nicolas Mora, wrote:
> As I'm used to, right after sending an email to the list, I found a
> beginning o an answer
>
> Le 20-04-26 à 20 h 27, Nicolas Mora a écrit :
> > SyntaxError: /opt/redux-4.0.1/src/applyMiddleware.js: Unexpected token
> > (37:6)
> > 35 |
> >
Hi,
Due to #956517 several packages have been marked for auto-removal.
I have fixed it, and build+Autopkgtests pass.
I have pushed my changes to the team-repo here [1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-rw
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, 15:33 Xavier, wrote:
> Le 20/03/2020 à 09:46, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:03, Nilesh Patra > <mailto:npatra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
>
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Nilesh Patra
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: node-mermaid
> Version : 8.4.8
> Upstream Author : Knut Sveidqvist
>
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, 17:08 Xavier, wrote:
> Le 19/03/2020 à 12:02, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, 16:23 Xavier, > <mailto:y...@debian.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Le 19/03/2020 à 10:58, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> > > Hi,
&g
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, 16:23 Xavier, wrote:
> Le 19/03/2020 à 10:58, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > node-dagre-layout is currently a package of upstream: dagre-layout.
> > dagre-layout itself is a fork of dagre.
> > Since there's currently a requireme
Hi,
node-dagre-layout is currently a package of upstream: dagre-layout.
dagre-layout itself is a fork of dagre.
Since there's currently a requirement of dagre, I have changed the upstream
to dagre instead, and updated watch, copyright, control, et. al. files
accordingly, and also added in a
Hi,
node-graphlibrary is currently a package of upstream: graphlibrary.
graphlibrary itself is a fork of graphlib
Since there's currently a requirement of graphlib, I have changed the
upstream to graphlib instead, and updated watch, copyright, control, et.
al. files accordingly, and also added in
Hi,
Node-dagre-d3-renderer is currently a package of upstream:
dagre-d3-renderer.
dagre-d3-renderer itself is a fork of dagre-d3
Since there's currently a requirement of dagre-d3, I have changed the
upstream to dagre-d3 instead, and updated watch, copyright, control, et.
al. files accordingly, and
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, 01:04 Jonas Smedegaard, wrote:
> Quoting Nilesh Patra (2020-03-17 20:20:08)
> > That said, could you as well review my changes for node-terser
> > here[1].
>
> Better if you use the bugtracker for already tracked issues:
> 950...@bugs.debian.org
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, 23:52 Jonas Smedegaard, wrote:
> Quoting Nilesh Patra (2020-02-02 18:51:01)
> > On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 22:48, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> > > Quoting Nilesh Patra (2020-02-02 16:01:57)
> > > > I fixed node-jsonld to buil
Hi,
In order to fix webpack(currently broken in unstable), I have modified
node-webassemblyjs to build with nodejs (<= 11) (as nodejs12 transition is
expected to take time).
It builds fine in a clean chroot, and I have fixed most of the lintian
stuff; there are however a few file permission
Hi,
Currently node-json-stringify-safe reports failed tests. I have fixed them,
build + autopkgtests pass.
I have pushed my changes to team-repo here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-json-stringify-safe
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Hi,
Currently node-nodemailer FTBFS. I have fixed it, and build + autopkgtests
pass.
I have pushed my changes to team repo here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-nodemailer
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
I think we should start Node.js 12 migration (with rollup, webpack,
> gulp,...), this will also fix some RC/FTBFS bugs, should we?
> I fixed a lot of failing autopkgtest errors (using [1] list), most of
> the remaining packages in this list will be fixed by node-iconv rebuild.
>
Agreed.
Hi,
I have fixed node-prelude-ls which was FTBFS earlier, build + autopkgtests
seem fine.
I have pushed the changes to team repo here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-prelude-ls
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
I fixed node-builtin-modules which currently FTBFS, build+autopkgtests pass.
I have pushed to the team-repo here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]:https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-builtin-modules
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
Currently node-depd FTBFS. I have fixed it, builds in a clean chroot +
autopkgtests pass.
I have pushed my to team repo changes here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-depd
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
Currently node-jsonminify FTBFS. I have fixed it, builds in a clean chroot
+ autopkgtests pass.
I have pushed my to team repo changes here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-jsonminify
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi
On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 13:41:37 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> control: tags -1 +confirmed
> control: retitle -1 node-terser FTBFS: fails 7 tests in "bin/uglifyjs"
and "bin/uglifyjs with input file globs"
>
> Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-02-04 16:29:34)
> > Source: node-terser
> > Version:
Hi,
On 18 February 2020 11:26:38 GMT+05:30, Xavier wrote:
>Hi,
>
>here is a list of bugs to fix [1]
>
> * rainloop: ROM-RM or fix dependencies (last dependency to node-json3
> which is going to be removed, jquery update needed,...)
> * node-jsdom: missing deps #743151 (ROM-RM ?)
>
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, 11:26 Xavier, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a list of bugs to fix [1]
>
> * rainloop: ROM-RM or fix dependencies (last dependency to node-json3
> which is going to be removed, jquery update needed,...)
> * node-jsdom: missing deps #743151 (ROM-RM ?)
> *
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 01:24, Xavier wrote:
> Le 08/02/2020 à 16:12, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I fixed node-vue-template-compiler's autopkgtests to pass with Node.js
> >>= 12. It builds fine in a clean chroot with autopkgtests passing. I
> > have pushed m
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, 11:44 Xavier, wrote:
> Le 07/02/2020 à 06:34, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, 10:57 Xavier, > <mailto:y...@debian.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Le 07/02/2020 à 06:24, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> > >
Hi,
I fixed node-vue-template-compiler's autopkgtests to pass with Node.js >=
12. It builds fine in a clean chroot with autopkgtests passing. I have
pushed my changes here[1].
(Didn't push to JS team since I wasn't completely sure).
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]:
Hi
I fixed less.js to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds in a clean chroot
and autopkgtests pass as well.
I have pushed my changes here[1].
Need review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/less.js
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, 10:57 Xavier, wrote:
> Le 07/02/2020 à 06:24, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, 03:58 Xavier, > <mailto:y...@debian.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Did you update your apt-cacher files ?
> >
> >
> &g
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, 03:58 Xavier, wrote:
> Did you update your apt-cacher files ?
>
Yes, I did. I seem to get the same error.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 01:23, Xavier wrote:
> Le 06/02/2020 à 19:19, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I am finding these errors in a few packages:
> >
> > ERROR in
> >
> /usr/share/nodejs/babel-runtime/core-js/object/get-own-property-descriptor.js
> &
Hi,
I am finding these errors in a few packages:
ERROR in
/usr/share/nodejs/babel-runtime/core-js/object/get-own-property-descriptor.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve
'core-js/library/fn/object/get-own-property-descriptor' in
'/usr/share/nodejs/babel-runtime/core-js/object'
@
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, 00:46 Xavier, wrote:
> Le 02/02/2020 à 11:01, Xavier a écrit :
> > There are no 2 packages to fix at least. I did my best with partial
> > patches but I need help to fix them:
> > * node-srs: new upstream version not compatible with current libgdal,
> > need
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 22:48, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Nilesh Patra (2020-02-02 16:01:57)
> > I fixed node-jsonld to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds fine in a
> clean
> > chroot, and autopkgtests pass.
> > (Didn't use pkg-js-tools since I'm unsure if
Hi,
I fixed node-jsonld to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds fine in a clean
chroot, and autopkgtests pass.
(Didn't use pkg-js-tools since I'm unsure if I should embed modules only
for test).
I have pushed my changed here[1].
(Didn't push to js-team since I was unsure of the changes)
Needs
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 20:23, Xavier wrote:
> Le 02/02/2020 à 14:45, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I was trying to fix node-jsonld. There were a lot of 'Module not found'
> > errors, and resolving paths in webpack.config.js helped.
> > However, there are a few c
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 19:15, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi,
> I was trying to fix node-jsonld. There were a lot of 'Module not found'
> errors, and resolving paths in webpack.config.js helped.
> However, there are a few core-js related errors which are still there. I
>
Did you verify https://bugs.debian.org/873148 ?
>
Checked just now.
It seems that the upstream hasn't fixed it yet.
Is it not fit for release then, yet?
>
> --
> Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
> Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
>
>
Hi,
I fixed node-shell-quote autopkgtest to pass with Node.js >= 12. It builds
fine in a clean chroot, and autopkgtests pass. I have pushed my changes
here[1]. (Didn't push to js-team, because the earlier version was
unreleased, and I want sure as to what should have been done about that).
Needs
Hi,
I have fixed node-jschardet to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds fine in
a clean chroot, and autopkgtests pass as well. I have pushed my changed to
the js-team repository here[1]. (without tag - since uploaders usually add
them)
Needs review and sponsorship
[1]:
Hi,
I fixed node-type-check autopkgtest to pass with Node.js >= 12. It builds
fine in a clean chroot and autopkgtests pass. I have pushed my changes to
js-team repo here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-type-check/
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, 04:11 Pirate Praveen, wrote:
>
>
> On 2020, ജനുവരി 29 8:45:37 PM GMT+01:00, Nilesh Patra
> wrote:
> >If in case my commits are unrelated, I fear cluttering the js-team
> >repo,
> >with those.
> >So I push to my local fork to avo
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, 01:11 Xavier, wrote:
> Le 29/01/2020 à 20:33, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I fixed the autopkgtest for node-xoauth2 to pass with Node.js >= 12. It
> > builds fine in a clean chroot, and the autopktests pass. I have pushed
> > my ch
Hi,
I fixed the autopkgtest for node-xoauth2 to pass with Node.js >= 12. It
builds fine in a clean chroot, and the autopktests pass. I have pushed my
changed here[1].
Need review and sponsorship
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/node-xoauth2
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Hi,
I fixed node-source-map-support autopkgtest to pass with Node.js >= 12.
Updating the package helped.
It builds fine in a clean chroot, and the autopkgtests pass as well. I have
pushed my changes here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]:
Hi,
I fixed node-optionator's autopkgtests to pass with Node.js >= 12. It
builds fine in a clean chroot now, and the autopkgtests pass as well. I
have pushed my changes here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/node-optionator
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Hi,
Node-pako is fixed to build with Node.js >= 12 the new update, released
today by the upstream.
I did the new update with the package, and it builds fine in a clean
chroot, and the autopkgtests pass as well. I have pushed the changes
here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]:
Hi,
I fixed node-sshpk to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds fine in a clean
chroot, and the autopkgtests pass as well. I have pushed my changes
here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/node-sshpk
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, 00:27 Nilesh Patra, wrote:
> Hi,
> I have fixed node-node-sass to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds fine in
> a clean chroot and the autopkgtests pass as well. I have pushed my changed
> here[1].
> Needs review and sponsorship.
>
> [1]: https:/
Hi,
I have fixed node-node-sass to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds fine in
a clean chroot and the autopkgtests pass as well. I have pushed my changed
here[1].
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/node-node-sass
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 at 22:33, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi,
> I fixed node-grunt-babel to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds in a clean
> chroot and autopkgtests pass well. Needs review and sponsorship
> (Also, I didn't use pkg-js-tools since require fails)
>
> Thanks and regar
Hi,
I fixed node-grunt-babel to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds in a clean
chroot and autopkgtests pass well. Needs review and sponsorship
(Also, I didn't use pkg-js-tools since require fails)
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi
I fixed eyes.js to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds fine in a clean
chroot. I have pushed my changes here[1]
Needs review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/eyes.js
Thanks!
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
>
> Hi,
>
> 1 - remove debian/install (pkg-js-tools does the job in this case)
> 2 - update homepage, source and debian/watch (duck reports that git repo
> moved to https://github.com/nodejs/string_decoder)
> 3 - launch "cme fix dpkg" to remove unneeded version constraints from
> (build)
Hi,
I have fixed node-string-decoder to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds
fine in a clean chroot. I have pushed my changes here[1].
Needs Review and sponsorship.
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/node-string-decoder
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 01:04, Xavier wrote:
> Le 21/01/2020 à 20:23, Xavier a écrit :
> > Le 21/01/2020 à 19:18, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 23:11, Xavier >> <mailto:x.guim...@free.fr>> wrote:
> &
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 23:11, Xavier wrote:
> Le 21/01/2020 à 16:08, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > please regenerate minified files (exclude + repack): launch make in
> > subdirectories
> >
> >
> > Did the changes as as
> Hi,
>
> please regenerate minified files (exclude + repack): launch make in
> subdirectories
>
>
Did the changes as asked. Could you review now?
Thanks!
> Cheers,
> Xavier
>
> --
> Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
> Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
>
>
Hi,
I have fixed science.js to build with Node.js >= 12. It builds fine in a
clean chroot. I have pushed my changes here[1].
Could someone please review it? That would be great!
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/science.js
Thanks and regards
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, 01:31 Nilesh Patra, wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 13:33, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>> Nilesh: how to you build node-nan ?
>> Using
>> gbp buildpackage -d experimental --extra-repository='deb
>> http://httpredir.debian.org/debian experi
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 13:33, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Nilesh: how to you build node-nan ?
> Using
> gbp buildpackage -d experimental --extra-repository='deb
> http://httpredir.debian.org/debian experimental main'
> --build-dep-resolver=aspcud
> tests + autopkgtests are all right doing that.
>
Hi,
I
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 01:06, Xavier wrote:
> Le 17/01/2020 à 18:55, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 05:02, Pirate Praveen > <mailto:prav...@onenetbeyond.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On വെ, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:33, Paolo Grepp
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 05:02, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>
>
> On വെ, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:33, Paolo Greppi
> wrote:
> > Il 16/01/20 20:35, Pirate Praveen ha scritto:
> >>
> >>
> >> On വ്യാ, Jan 16, 2020 at 13:27, Nilesh Patra
> >> wrote:
Hi,
I had been lately seeing discussions in the list regarding requiring
transition for nodejs-12 to unstable. I tested all the reverse depends and
this is the list of all failing reverse-depends[1] and the repository[2]
contains all the individual logs(for all reverse-depends) for convenience.
> This commit ->
https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/node-rollup-plugin-babel/commit/402f216f45fc062d1e815014a020f753ed1a350d
does not seem right. Do you really need name option for cjs and es builds?
> Even if you need, I think you just copy pasted from
node-rollup-plugin-buble. Or is that
Hi
I was working on node-rollup-plugin-babel, as a part of rollup 1.0.2
transitions. It built fine earlier with my changes on, but now the test
during build seem to fail with the following error:
dh_auto_test --buildsystem=nodejs
/usr/bin/node -e require\(\"./.\"\)
Hi
I was working on node-rollup-plugin-babel for rollup transitions to 1.0.2.
I have pushed my changes to:
https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/node-rollup-plugin-babel .It would be
great if it can be reviewed.
Thanks and regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
> I have pushed changes to local fork here -
> salsa.debian.net/gi-boi-guest/popper.js
>
https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/popper.js
I'm afraid.
Thanks!
>
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
Hi
Popper.js is a part of rollup transitions to 0.56.3 I have pushed changes
to local fork here - salsa.debian.net/gi-boi-guest/popper.js
Could it please be reviewed?
Thanks and Regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
Please fix "nodejs-module-installed-in-usr-lib" at least
>
Fixed, Please review.
Thanks and Regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Hi,
>
> your package is empty. Using pkg-js-tools isn't good here: this is not
> really a node module. Prefer to update debian/install
>
> Cheers,
> Xavier
>
> --
> Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
> Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
>
>
Hi!
twitter-bootstrap4 is one of the many packages that we need to fix during
rollup transitions(to 0.56-3) and I was working on it.
I have pushed the changes to -
https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/twitter-bootstrap4 and built it
with sbuild, using the --extra-package option.
It would be
Hi
> * install: good, just to set a minimal version for pkg-js-tools to help
> backports (0.9 at least)
>
> * tests: you didn't use pkg-js-tools for tests, then your autopkgtest
> tests are bad. Todo:
>$ mkdir -p debian/tests/pkg-js
>$ git rm
Hi,
>
> OK for removing the patch.
>
> You removed debian/install without adding pkg-js-tools needed entries
> (d/control & d/rules), then your package is empty.
>
> Cheers,
> Xavier
>
Hi
I have rectified the issues. Could you review, if everything looks okay?
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 13:58, Xavier wrote:
> Le 28/08/2019 à 09:19, Utkarsh Gupta a écrit :
> > Hey,
> >
> > On 15/08/19 12:07 pm, Xavier wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> "gulp build-babel-standalone" command succeeds here (7.5.5) with the
> >> following package:
> >>
> >> PACKAGE :
/bin/node-sass was linked to a non existent file
>
>>* The pristine-tar branch contains the in-publish files, is there a
>> way to un-commit them?
>
> Simply:
> $ git checkout pristine-tar
> $ ls
> $ git rm
> $ git commit -a -m 'Remove useless files'
> $ gi
* sass-spec is a dev dependency: no need to install it
> * don't use lintian-overrides to hide some real problems (fixed by ^)
> * never set an empty debian/tests/pkg-js/test: this produces a bad
>autopkgtest report (success while no test where played)
> * enabling test shows that
> missing-dependency-on-libc: missing "${shlibs:Depends}" in package
> dependencies
> macos-ds-store-file-in-package: add a "override_dh_install":
> override_dh_install:
> dh_install
> find debian/node-node-sass/ -name .DS_Store -delete
>
I did the
Thanks a lot for fixing this !
>
> @Nilesh: here is the new diff with hardening flags enabled
>
Hi, Thanks for the patches. I tried them, build and sbuild pass. However,
I end up with some lintian errors and warnings, and I am
not sure as to how to resolve them. Could you suggest a fix?
Needed component are: async-foreach, gaze, get-stdin, js-base64,
> sass-graph, sass-spec, scss-tokenizer, stdout-stream, true-case-path.
> "in-publish" seems not used
>
I have included them, but on sbuild I get a few lintian errors which I have
no idea as to how to resolve.
E: node-node-sass:
Hello,
>
> some things to do:
> - Architecture must be "any", not "all"
> - don't install .md files in /usr/lib/nodejs/node-sass
> - don't install LICENSE, COPYING,... in /usr/lib/nodejs/node-sass
> - take care of:
>W: node-node-sass: executable-not-elf-or-script
>
This in rules works (workaround)
>
> export NODE_PATH := ${CURDIR}:/usr/share
>
Thanks! This works and I was able to build node-node-sass.
Regards
Nilesh
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
path to
node-gyp.js but that doesn't seem to work out too. Please let me know if
there are other files that I should make changes to.
Regards
Nilesh
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, 23:33 Jérémy Lal, wrote:
>
>
> Le mar. 23 juil. 2019 à 17:18, Nilesh Patra a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi
>>
Hi
>
https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/node-node-sass/blob/master/scripts/build.js#L59
> replace
> require.resolve(path.join('node-gyp', 'bin', 'node-gyp.js'))
> by
> 'node-gyp'
On doing that, I'm again getting the same error message which was reported
earlier. Are there other files which
understand why that is the case and
a workaround for it.
Regards
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 at 17:44, Xavier wrote:
> Le 21/07/2019 à 13:14, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
> > Hi
> > While trying to build node-node-sass, I had to embed a few modules. Now
> > when I build I get this e
Hi
While trying to build node-node-sass, I had to embed a few modules. Now
when I build I get this error on a module(node-true-case-path) which I
embedded:
dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
node-node-sass/true-case-path/LICENSE
Hi
While packaging node-mermaid and resolving relevant paths. I experience
several of these errors:
WARNING in ./src/themes ^\.\/.*\/index\.scss$
Module not found: Error: Recursion in resolving
Stack:
resolve:
(/home/nilesh/mermaidpack/reversion/node-mermaid-8.1.0/node-mermaid)
> Please don't add the complete Apache license to your debian/copyright.
> It is fine to point to the file in /usr/share/common-licenses
> Further your description looks a bit strange.
>
The package has been fixed and re-uploaded, please check.
Regards
Nilesh
>
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing
I have committed the changes in
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-d3-scale-chromatic/tree/master/debian
, as asked .
It is my humble request to you for uploading this package.
Thanks
Regards
Nilesh
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 02:57, Xavier wrote:
> Le 30/05/2019 à 06:10, Nilesh Patra a éc
Hi!
With reference to the conversation in these mails for d3-scale-chtomatic :
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2019-February/031950.html
I have made the changes asked and it does work fine as per my
understanding. I have pushed the changes to my local fork here at
101 - 194 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
