On 2018, നവംബർ 22 9:19:51 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote:
>Hi, I have packaged node-tar-fs:
>https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-tar-fs
>
>I am Cc-ing the ITP.
>
>Please someone sponsor the upload.
I think this is another candidate for embedding (no build steps required, not
depended on by multi
On 11/22/18 5:12 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> node-v8-compile-cache originally uploaded to NEW here:
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2018-April/025959.html
> has been marked for rejection here:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/NEW
> and consequ
On 11/22/18 4:47 PM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> does anybody know why has node-babel-plugin-transform-inline-imports-commonjs
> originally uploaded to NEW here:
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2018-April/025812.html
> been marked for rejection here:
> http
On 2018, നവംബർ 15 8:54:58 PM IST, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
>The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>node-boxen : Depends: node-camelcase (>= 4.0.0) but 3.0.0-1 is to be
>installed
>E: Unable to correct problems, you have he
On 2018, നവംബർ 15 9:01:15 PM IST, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
>The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>node-tar : Depends: node-yallist (>= 3.0.2~) but 2.0.0-1 is to be
>installed
>E: Unable to correct problems, you have held
On 2018, നവംബർ 14 8:11:39 PM IST, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 3:09 PM Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
>No it is nyc. So we need to package nyc
Can't we just patch and skip these? Style checks can be skipped for Debian
package I think.
--
Sent from my Android d
On 2018, നവംബർ 14 7:23:24 PM IST, Nicolas Mora wrote:
>Le 2018-11-14 05:43, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>Also, I just realized that the script jest/bin/jest.js contains this
>simple code:
>
>require('jest-cli/bin/jest');
>
>So I think we should remove the file debia
On 2018, നവംബർ 14 12:08:30 AM IST, Nicolas Mora wrote:
>I don't think either that making a group package for such small
>dependencies is a good idea to build other javascript packages.
>
>Concerning jest, I've created a merge request in the current salsa repo
>
>to complete the node-jest packag
On 2018, നവംബർ 11 11:07:04 PM IST, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 5:15 PM Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
>Not embded use group source feature of git uscan please.
>
I don't think grouping unrelated packages is a good idea. If there is a
circular dependency or
On 2018, നവംബർ 11 7:13:47 PM IST, Nicolas Mora wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm working on packaging Taliesin, an audio streaming server with a
>front-end written in react [1].
Welcome to javascript team.
>To build the front-end, I need some new node packages. I've already
>starting packaging some of th
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 16 5:10:00 PM IST, Ross Gammon
wrote:
>What is the hold up with rollup? I was looking into rollup/acorn in
>Ubuntu, and things have got very messy there. None of them will build
>without the right version of each other. It looks like a messed up
>transition in Debian. We sho
Hi,
With great work from Ashutosh we have node-rollup useable directly in
node without any build step (converted to cjs with a patch).
When building node-rollup-plugin-commonjs (node-d3-color as well), we
get this error.
(node:9760) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Error: Could not resolve
entr
On 9/16/18 5:10 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> Hmm. No ideas for bluebird here really, other than bundling a pre-built
> acorn npm node_module style.
I just uploaded node-bluebird and acorn to stretch-backports. As
mentioned earlier, acorn source was converted to CJS modules with a
patc
On 10/28/18 2:22 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Try
> require('gyp')
But gyp and node-gyp are two different modules.
/usr/share/node-gyp/package.json says name is node-gyp, so
require('node-gyp') is expected to work.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailin
On 9/14/18 9:55 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
> On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 14 9:44:15 PM IST, "Jérémy Lal" wrote:
>> Le ven. 14 sept. 2018 à 18:12, Pirate Praveen
>> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>
>>> Any reason node-gyp is
On 10/26/18 6:53 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 06:43:38PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>> I have combined the two and reuploaded.
>> This upload was rejected. Please reject 16.2.0-1 as well so I can upload it
>> again.
>
> Please u
On 2018, ഒക്ടോബർ 26 5:12:06 PM IST, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>On 10/25/18 1:42 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>
>> node-react is split in two binary packages: node-react and
>node-react-dom.
>> Both binary packages have the same dependencies, nor are they large,
>so the
On 10/25/18 1:42 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> node-react is split in two binary packages: node-react and node-react-dom.
> Both binary packages have the same dependencies, nor are they large, so there
> is no reason to split them.
I have combined the two and reuploaded.
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please
On 10/23/18 7:06 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I started working on the update and just looked at the devDependencies,
> it needs browserify, webpack, rollup and gulp to build! This is new
> record even by node's own standard!
It seems webpack is used only for babel-standalone so I ha
Hi team,
Webpack 3 -> 4 update was requested recently which needs babel 7. In
addition to it, esm needs (which will allow us to skip rollup for ES
modules to help fix many circular dependencies) babel 7, gitlab also
needs babel 7.
I started working on the update and just looked at the devDependen
On 2018, ഒക്ടോബർ 19 1:00:05 AM IST, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
>Source: node-webpack
>Version: 3.5.6-3
>Severity: wishlist
>Control: affects -1 src:gpgme1.0
>Control: block 911189 by -1
>
>https://github.com/webpack/webpack/archive/v4.21.0.tar.gz is available
>upstream.
>
>The debian package f
On 10/14/18 2:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> package depends on software (node-num2fraction) that should be embedded.
Fixed and reuploaded.
> Thorsten
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you
On 9/26/18 2:30 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> May be with this patch, we can drop the circular build dependency between
> acorn and rollup.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/juggernaut451-guest/acorn/blob/cjs/debian/patches/cjs.patch
I am able to build bluebird with this patched version
On 10/12/18 1:31 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> this package depends on software that needs to be embedded and has some
> lintian E:
Fixed and reuploaded
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
On 10/12/18 1:31 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> this package depends on software that needs to be embedded
Fixed and reuploaded.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.deb
On 10/12/18 1:33 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you please tell me where I can find the build-dependency: bablejs?
node-babel-cli provides babeljs
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-babel/blob/master/debian/control#L57
$ apt-cache search babeljs
node-babel-cli - Babel command li
On 10/12/18 2:30 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> please also mention at least the BSD license in your debian/copyright,
Fixed and reuploaded
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.ne
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 28 10:52:24 AM IST, Petter Reinholdtsen
wrote:
>
>vows test/env-assert.js test/\*/\*-test.js
>module.js:549
>throw err;
>^
>
>Error: Cannot find module 'glob'
Just add node-glob as build dependency.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my bre
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:51:58 -0400 =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?=
wrote: > FWIW, I've also submitted this as a merge
request in salsa.
Thanks for the patch. As this is not a native debian package, can you
send the pull request to https://github.com/LeoIannacone/npm2deb or
modify the existing me
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 16 5:16:39 PM IST, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>On 16/09/18 5:10 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
>> Hmm. No ideas for bluebird here really, other than bundling a
>pre-built
>> acorn npm node_module style.
>
>Ashutosh (https://github.com/juggernaut451) is trying t
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 25 3:14:55 PM IST, ashutosh singh
wrote:
>Hello
>
>I am porting acorn to es5 as currently it's using rollup to convert
>from
>es6 to es5. As next step would be compiling bluebird with this es5
>version.
>I am able to build the bluebird with it.
Basic idea is,
If we convert
On 9/23/18 8:28 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:53 PM Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can someone confirm if you can build acorn from git repo? I tried master
>> and debian/5.5.3+ds3-1 both failed.
>
> Did you see i
On 9/24/18 4:05 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> No it is quite easy with newer fakeupstream support. It a joy, Did you try ?
1. Well, we don't always use the fakeupstream. Most of the time it is
github tarballs.
2. It still involve manual effort in multiple packages rather than do it
once for all (
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 24 2:28:00 PM IST, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:43 AM Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/24/18 2:09 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> >> I think it is over engineering and making things unnecessarily
>complex. T
On 9/24/18 2:09 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> I think it is over engineering and making things unnecessarily complex. This
>> can be a fallback option if a separate version of type definition is
>> required instead of the centrally shipped version.
> And how to you keep version in sync ?
You a
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 23 8:26:25 PM IST, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>types node should go to parent package. i means node-types-acorn
>should go to package node-acorn using fakeuptstream multiple tar
>improvement if needed
>
I think it is over engineering and making things unnecessarily complex. T
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 24 6:24:50 AM IST, Julien Puydt
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Le 23/09/2018 à 16:44, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>> On 9/23/18 5:13 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
>>> What do you think of the attached script? It assumes the upstream
>>> DefinitelyTyped tree is in &
On 9/23/18 5:13 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> What do you think of the attached script? It assumes the upstream
> DefinitelyTyped tree is in "DefinitelyTyped.upstream" as it's the layout
> I use for my experiment, and generates a "control" file and a bunch of
> "node-types-*.install" files.
Did you ch
Package: node-typescript-types
severity: wishlist
version: 20170519-1
Control: block 909424 by -1
Please add type definitions for @types/glob. Also update other types
definitions compatible with,
"@types/chai": "^3.4.34",
"@types/glob": "^5.0.35",
"@types/jsdom": "11.0.1",
"@types/moc
On 9/22/18 5:17 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> No because it is source included. How do you take care of version hell
If a package needs a different version of type definition that shipped
in node-typescript-types, the module should be updated or type
definition should be embedded.
signature.as
Package: node-xterm
version: 2.7.0+ds1-1
severity: wishlist
I'd like to get node-xterm >= 3.5 for gitlab. I have started working on
the update, but it requires updating node-typescript-types with more
type definitions or simple embed it inside the package directly.
signature.asc
Description: Op
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 22 8:24:47 PM IST, Ross Gammon
wrote:
>I have merged all the previous stretch-backports commits, and rebased
>the backport onto the latest version in testing.
>
>Unfortunately, I get the same issue as before, and it won't build for
>me. Firstly, you have to use "--git-no-pri
On 8/10/18 2:58 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>
> - just one node-types-definitelytyped real package would provide all
> necessary node-types-foo ones, so if a package needs the @types/foo, it
> can depend on node-types-foo and the right one is pulled in ;
>
>
> No
There is already s
Hi,
Can someone confirm if you can build acorn from git repo? I tried master
and debian/5.5.3+ds3-1 both failed.
pravi@nishumbha:~/forge/debian/git/js-team/acorn$ dpkg-source -b .
dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)'
dpkg-source: info: applying modernize_rollup_config.patch
dpkg-s
Hi David,
I need bootstrap 4 for gitlab (though only its node counterpart). I'm
thinking of creating a new source package node-bootstrap (if required
create libjs-bootstrap4 binary). What is your plan with bootstrap 4?
Thanks
Praveen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg
On 9/21/18 12:29 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in fact, uuid is already in Debian, even the relatively recent
> version 3.2.1, but embedded in the npm package. #895625 can just
> be closed, I assume.
It is embedded because node-uuid is not available. It should be dropped
when uuid 3.2.1
uild|
+----------+
Unpack source
-
Format: 3.0 (quilt)
Source: node-dashdash
Binary: node-dashdash
Architecture: all
Version: 1.14.1-1
Maintaine
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 16 5:16:39 PM IST, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>> What is the hold up with rollup? I was looking into rollup/acorn in
>> Ubuntu, and things have got very messy there. None of them will build
>> without the right version of each other. It looks like a messed u
package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.8-1
severity: grave
justification: fails to perform its core function of creating debs
npm2deb create @ava/write-file-atomic
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/npm2deb", line 7, in
sys.exit(main(sys.argv))
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/n
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:34:25 +0200 Paolo Greppi
wrote:
> I am OK with moving the repo from collab-maint to salsa and trying a team
> upload.
> Unless the previous uploaders want to take action.
I'm planning to update request now. I have already moved the repo to
salsa under js-team. I'm planning
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 18 2:57:36 AM IST, "W. Martin Borgert"
wrote:
>Hi Jonas, hi team,
>
>I can't find node-uuid on salsa, and collab-maint is dead.
>
>Therefore:
>
> - Is it OK, if I just create the git repo in the js-team space
> using the versions 1.4.0-1 (oldstable, stable) and 1.4.7-5
>
Control: tags -1 help
chownr 1.1 will now use fs.lchown if available, but we will have to wait
till nodejs 10.6 is available for the actual fix. So I will keep this
bug open.
But chownr 1.1 tests are currently failing so help is welcome.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Package: npm2deb
version: 0.2.8-1
severity: wishlist
node-tar embeds some dependencies as components [1] and uses
pkg-components to build. It would be great if npm2deb can automate this
step.
For example,
npm2deb add minizlib
should create debian/components/minizlib and populate the files inside
On 16/09/18 5:10 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Hmm. No ideas for bluebird here really, other than bundling a pre-built
> acorn npm node_module style.
Ashutosh (https://github.com/juggernaut451) is trying to replace
bluebird with ES6 native promise (though it will be slower).
> What is the hold up with
Control: fixed -1 5.8.0+ds-1
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 13:25:50 -0600 Anthony Fok wrote:
> There is a fix landed to the completion script in d7271b8 [2]
> – the lib/utils/completion.sh included in the tree at that
> version (which will be part of the next npm@2 release,
> coming out later tonight as n
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 08:46:42 +0200 Matthias Urlichs
wrote:
> Package: npm
> Version: 5.8.0+ds-1
> Severity: minor
>
> npm WARN npm npm does not support Node.js v10.4.0
> npm WARN npm You should probably upgrade to a newer version of node as we
> npm WARN npm can't make any promises that npm will w
Control: fixed -1 5.8.0+ds-1
On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:16:38 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> the following vulnerability was published for npm.
>
> CVE-2016-3956[0]:
> | The CLI in npm before 2.15.1 and 3.x before 3.8.3, as used in Node.js
> | 0.10 before 0.10.44, 0.12 before 0.12.13, 4 before
Control: fixed -1 5.8.0+ds3-1
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:16:08 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> Control: forcemerge 904071 -1
>
> pravi@andhaka:/tmp/lirc$ npm install --production lirc
It is working now.
pravi@nishumbha:/tmp$ npm install --production lirc
npm WARN deprecated coffee-scri
Hi Jeremy,
Any reason node-gyp is installed in /usr/share/node-gyp and not in
/usr/share/nodejs/node-gyp?
I get this error when building npm,
node bin/npm-cli.js cache clean
npm ERR! code MODULE_NOT_FOUND
npm ERR! Cannot find module 'node-gyp/bin/node-gyp'
and the log
5 verbose stack Error: Ca
On 9/13/18 2:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I had to remove the dependency from all embedded modules as well and now
> autopkgtest is passing.
Backporting node-bluebird is going to be challenging (impossible?). It
build depends on node-acron which build depends on rollup, but rollup is
n
On 9/13/18 1:05 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Control: block 907515 by 843951
>
> jingle-session seems to need at least async 2.5.0
>
> Please consider packaging a recent release, thanks!
I think it is harder to update async because of its build dependency on
closure-compiler. But neo-async is a
On 9/12/18 11:39 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I have removed the dependency and pushed to git, but autopkgtest is
> failing. Can someone help me figure out the root cause? We should be
> able to replace any readable-stream usage by require("stream") instead.
I had to remove the
On 9/8/18 8:26 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/npm/wikis/home
npm has a dependency on node-readable-stream, but it is not used
anywhere. If at all we need to backport, it will pull in
node-string-decoder and babel-polyfill and whole babel.
I have removed the dependency a
On 9/11/18 10:45 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Hi Xavier,
>
> The example in Provides section should be written
> Provides: node-ta, node-tb
> ?
I think there should not be Provides as it implies sharing, which will
negate the reason why we are embedding in the first place.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel m
On 06/09/18 10:15 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can
> help with categorizing it.
>
> I propose the following,
>
> 1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
> 2. Modules that includes a build s
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 6 2:15:11 AM IST, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>Hi everybody,
>
>as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
>NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
>
>node packages are rather small and often consist only of a few lines of
>
>code. From my
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 5 9:29:37 PM IST, Ross Gammon
wrote:
>I can try and help out with a few node-* backports. But work is keeping
>me busy, so progress would be slow. If it is a team effort, we probably
>need a list. Or use the ITP tracker on Gitlab?
Thanks! I think we can use the salsa wiki f
On 2018, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 25 3:22:06 PM IST, Ben Finney wrote:
>Howdy JavaScript-in-Debian maintainers,
>
>Thank you all for the pain-staking work that has brought the ‘npm’
>package to Debian.
>
>Version “5.8.0+ds-2” entered Debian Testing today, so that makes it
>significantly more feasible to do Java
On 2018, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 31 6:30:17 PM IST, Alexander Wirt
wrote:
>
>Where is that version from? Testing has 5.8.0?
This version was in Debian for about 3+ years. It was removed before the
stretch release because it could not be updated in time for stretch. But now
new version is available in buste
[Resending from another id]
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 1 8:32:08 AM IST, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
>On 2018, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 31 6:30:17 PM IST, Alexander Wirt
> wrote:
>>
>>Where is that version from? Testing has 5.8.0?
>
>This version was in Debian for about 3+ years. It w
On 2018, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 31 4:57:54 PM IST, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>Package: npm2deb
>Version: 0.2.8-1
>Severity: normal
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA512
>
>Attempting to follow https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks to
>resolve dependencies of node-server, in a limited env
On 2018, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 25 1:50:34 AM IST, Chris Lamb
wrote:
>Are you looking at Lintian? There are some glaring issues like:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-csv-spectrum.git
>^^^
This package was uploaded when it was still a valid URL. Anyway, I'll upd
Source: node-tar-pack
Severity: wishlist
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
node-tar-pack is affected by rc bug #906451 (it is compatible with
version of node-tar in unstable). The only reverse dependency,
node-pre-gyp no longer depends on it. node-pre-gyp which no longer
On 2018, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 23 1:15:17 PM IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Any news here? I need to package r-cran-leaflet which has a code copy
>of leaflet 1.3.1. I guess the recent upstream version 1.3.4 will be
>fine as well.
>
>I gave the packaging a naive try imported the new version into leaflet
>Git[1
On 20/08/18 3:48 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> node-mapnik 4.x requires mapnik 3.1 which is still in development,
> that's why I hadn't updated node-mapnik yet. I'm not planning on
> packaging the development snapshots for mapnik, their stack is too
> fragile for that.
Thanks for the info. I'
On 20/08/18 1:24 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 20/08/18 12:54 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On a second thought, since their builds also use node-pre-gyp, may be
>> rebuilds are enough. Anyway, I have updated node-zipfile to latest
>> upstream releases which supports this ve
On 20/08/18 12:54 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On a second thought, since their builds also use node-pre-gyp, may be
> rebuilds are enough. Anyway, I have updated node-zipfile to latest
> upstream releases which supports this version of node-pre-gyp.
>
>
node-sqlite3 also updat
On 20/08/18 10:58 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
> On 2018, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 20 1:17:52 AM IST, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> wrote:
>> I don't know, you should do a round of rebuilds to find out.
>
> Rebuilds won't be enough I think because these are runtime dependencies
On 2018, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 20 1:17:52 AM IST, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
>I don't know, you should do a round of rebuilds to find out.
Rebuilds won't be enough I think because these are runtime dependencies. As
they don't have functional autopkgtests enabled, we have to use upstream test
suite to c
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 21:54:11 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> The only package that depends on node-tar-pack is node-pre-gyp, which
> has a newer upstream release that no longer depends on tar-pack.
>
I have uploaded a new upstream version of node-pre-gyp (0.6.32-1 ->
0.10.2-1) to
The only package that depends on node-tar-pack is node-pre-gyp, which
has a newer upstream release that no longer depends on tar-pack.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debi
On 12/08/18 10:17 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> I was surprised this morning that npm2deb created a package with Vcs-*
> fields pointing to anonscm.debian.org... they should point to salsa
> instead.
It is already fixed in upstream master, we are waiting for a new release
(needs review of one pull req
On 19/07/18 12:50 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 19/07/18 12:16 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>> pravi@andhaka:/tmp/lirc$ npm install --production lirc
>
> npm i lactate
> npm WARN notice [SECURITY] lactate has the following vulnerability: 1
> high. Go here f
Control: fixed -1 5.8.0+ds-1
Works with last upload of npm 5.8.0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
On 19/07/18 12:16 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> pravi@andhaka:/tmp/lirc$ npm install --production lirc
npm i lactate
npm WARN notice [SECURITY] lactate has the following vulnerability: 1
high. Go here for more details:
https://nodesecurity.io/advisories?search=lactate&version=0.13.12 - Run
Control: forcemerge 904071 -1
pravi@andhaka:/tmp/lirc$ npm install --production lirc
npm WARN deprecated coffee-script@1.12.7: CoffeeScript on NPM has moved
to "coffeescript" (no hyphen)
npm WARN deprecated coffee-script@1.6.3: CoffeeScript on NPM has moved
to "coffeescript" (no hyphen)
npm WARN d
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 10:29:12 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?=
wrote> Hi,
> i'll upload node-tar 4.4.4 to unstable today with a couple of fixes.
>
> Jérémy
Any blockers for this? Can you upload node-tar to unstable? npm 5.8 is
now in experimental.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital si
Control: fixed -1 5.8.0+ds-1
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 15:06:02 +0200 Tobias Hoffmann
wrote:
> npm help is supposed to show the man page npm-,
> but it only shows the list of more-or-less matching commands
> (which basically says: type "npm help " to get more help).
It works with the last uploaded ve
package: npm
version: 5.8.0-1
severity: important
pravi@andhaka:/tmp/node_modules/pretty-ms$ npm install --production
npm notice created a lockfile as package-lock.json. You should commit
this file.
added 1 package from 1 contributor in 6.715s
╭─╮
│
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 18:10:55 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> I think this is the syntax used by sprokets. We may be able to patch it
> to use the regular commonjs require syntax.
>
I have pushed a patch to salsa. Can you build and test?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 04:43:43 -0700 njos...@riseup.net wrote:
> I think the issue is with coffeescript compilation. I tried compiling it
> using the coffee command. The index.js produced has no imports at all.
> Hence, the output that is finally produced using webpack and uglifyjs is
> just the inde
On June 23, 2018 8:32:22 PM GMT+05:30, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:06 AM, Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
>>
>> Can't this be node-types-foo? Then it follows the existing node-
>> standard and node-types can be used to filter types packages. This
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 18:44:53 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> Any ideas? May be we missed some options for webpack.
If we cannot emulate the build with webpack, we will have to package
blade (written in ruby).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mail
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 13:03:24 +0530 Joseph Nuthalapati
wrote:> The turbolinks package installed through
Debian doesn't seem to have all the
> code from upstream.
>
> The minified Javascript from the Debian package has 1448 characters while the
> dist packaged obtained from source has 36927 charact
On Saturday 19 May 2018 08:08 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:31 AM, Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On May 17, 2018 1:32:01 AM GMT+05:30, Julien Puydt
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Le 16/05/2018 à 17:45, Basti
Control: fixed -1 2.24+dfsg-1
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Control: fixed -1 2.24+dfsg-1
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:16:15 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> Latest version of rollup is 0.60.7 and it has already moved to
> rollup-plugin-commonjs 9.x
>
> https://github.com/rollup/rollup/blob/6e004184ede79832e658c22983de439aa5c30462/package.json
>
Using node-rollup-plugin-t
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 18:41:36 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> Package: src:node-rollup
> Version: 0.50.0-1
Latest version of rollup is 0.60.7 and it has already moved to
rollup-plugin-commonjs 9.x
https://github.com/rollup/rollup/blob/6e004184ede79832e658c22983de439aa5c30462/packag
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 01:06:57 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbXkgTGFs?=
wrote:> I was inspecting npm's master branch and i
couldn't resist fixing some
> trivial, but also some non-trivial, things, so please make sure you stay
> up-to-date with that branch.
>
> Jérémy
We are close to an experimental uplo
901 - 1000 of 1034 matches
Mail list logo
