Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:49:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922093: fixed in node-commander 2.12.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #922093,
regarding node-commander: FTBFS in sid (AssertionError: expected '' to be
'SIGHUPn')
to be marked as done.
This means that
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:25:03 +0100
Source: node-commander
Binary: node-commander
Architecture: source
Version: 2.12.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Changed-By: Xavier
node-commander_2.12.2-3_sourceonly.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-commander_2.12.2-3.dsc
node-commander_2.12.2-3.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #922093 [src:node-commander] node-commander: FTBFS in sid (AssertionError:
expected '' to be 'SIGHUPn')
Added tag(s) pending.
--
922093: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=922093
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 21:50:37 +0100
Source: pkg-js-tools
Binary: pkg-js-autopkgtest pkg-js-tools
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
pkg-js-tools_0.5_sourceonly.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pkg-js-tools_0.5.dsc
pkg-js-tools_0.5.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
even on a very slow machine with some parallel schroot builds, I'm
unable to reproduce this FTBFS failure. Maybe related to LXC
infrastructure. I'll test later.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:49:07 +0100
Source: libjs-sdp
Architecture: source
Version: 2.9.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard
Changes:
libjs-sdp_2.9.0-6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libjs-sdp_2.9.0-6.dsc
libjs-sdp_2.9.0-6.debian.tar.xz
libjs-sdp_2.9.0-6_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:01 AM, Jérémy Lal
wrote:
Do you get some log in ~/.npm ?
Since nodejs has a test suite, and since it crashes when extracting
tgz,
obvious culprit is node-tar, but i can't shoot something blindly if i
don't
have a (javascript) stack trace.
No, I don't see any
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 11:48:57AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > That would be absolutely fantastic, yes. Also a symlink from
> > libv8.so-> libnode.so woulde be handy, because libv8 doesn't use
> > pkg-config anywhere else so most bindings just test for linking with
> > -lv8.
> >
>
> Ok then no
Op di 12 feb. 2019 om 11:15 schreef Pirate Praveen :
> npm was not updated for over 3 years and was removed from stretch. See
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870460
>
> My motivation for updating it was for gitlab (I'd have been happy with
> even npm 1.4 as I only wanted 'npm
On ചൊ, ഫെബ്രു 12, 2019 at 2:59 വൈകു, Olaf van
der Spek wrote:
Op di 12 feb. 2019 om 10:25 schreef Pirate Praveen
:
> npm 6 has been available for some time..
>
If that introduce any rc bugs, there won't be enough time to fix it
and
I don't want to risk it at this point.
Makes
Op di 12 feb. 2019 om 10:25 schreef Pirate Praveen :
> > npm 6 has been available for some time..
> >
>
> If that introduce any rc bugs, there won't be enough time to fix it and
> I don't want to risk it at this point.
Makes sense. 6 has been available since May though, right? Why wasn't
it
On ചൊ, ഫെബ്രു 12, 2019 at 2:49 വൈകു, Olaf van
der Spek wrote:
Op di 12 feb. 2019 om 10:13 schreef Pirate Praveen
:
On ചൊ, ഫെബ്രു 12, 2019 at 2:34 വൈകു, Olaf
van
der Spek wrote:
> Could npm 6 be packaged?
We won't be able to get it into buster (soft freeze starting today),
Op di 12 feb. 2019 om 10:13 schreef Pirate Praveen :
> On ചൊ, ഫെബ്രു 12, 2019 at 2:34 വൈകു, Olaf van
> der Spek wrote:
> > Could npm 6 be packaged?
>
> We won't be able to get it into buster (soft freeze starting today),
> 2019-02-12 Soft freeze (no new packages, no re-entry, 10 day migration)
On ചൊ, ഫെബ്രു 12, 2019 at 2:34 വൈകു, Olaf van
der Spek wrote:
Could npm 6 be packaged?
We won't be able to get it into buster (soft freeze starting today),
but we can try for buster + 1 or possibly buster-backports.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Hi,
Could npm 6 be packaged?
Greetings,
--
Olaf
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
18 matches
Mail list logo
