[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#970651: Bug#970651: Bug#970651: rollup: Unable to build with current tsc

2020-09-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 21 3:37:01 AM IST, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> I think we should create a release team within js team to handle it >> like how release team works for transitions. > >What do you mean more concretely? > >That only a smaller elite group should (approve) upload to unstable, and

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Plan for legacy rollup plugins in bullseye (was Re: node-rollup-plugin-inject 4.0.2+~3.0.2-1 MIGRATED to testing)

2020-10-25 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ഒക്‌ടോബർ 25 10:09:13 AM IST, Debian testing watch wrote: >FYI: The status of the node-rollup-plugin-inject source package >in Debian's testing distribution has changed. > > Previous version: (not in testing) > Current version: 4.0.2+~3.0.2-1 Are we going to maintain legacy

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFH: FTBFS problem with jekyll build because some node* packages were updated

2020-10-25 Thread Pirate Praveen
[Adding pkg-javascript-devel list] On 2020, ഒക്‌ടോബർ 26 12:14:08 AM IST, Daniel Leidert wrote: >Hi, > >the jekyll build fails at the moment because livereload.js created in the >override_dh_auto_build target is not created. The creation prints some >warnings: > >> make[1]: Entering directory

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#964205: node-request: fails to build with node-uuid 8.2 in experimental

2020-07-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-request Version: 2.88.1-4 Severity: important Build fails with this error when building with node-uuid 8.2.0-1 in experimental. Error [ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED]: Package subpath './v4' is not defined by "exp orts" in /usr/share/nodejs/uuid/package.json Full build log

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#964206: node-http-signature: ftbfs with node-uuid 8.2 in experimental - Cannot read property 'on' of null

2020-07-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
--+ Unpack source - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 3.0 (quilt) Source: node-http-signature Binary: node-http-signature Architecture: all Version: 1.3.2-1 Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maint

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#964207: node-node-rest-client: autopkgtest fails with node-uuid 8.2 in experimental

2020-07-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-node-rest-client Version: 2.5.0-4 Severity: important This package's autopkgtest failed with node-uuid 8.2 in experimental with error Error [ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED]: Package subpath './v1' is not defined by "exports" in /usr/share/nodejs/uuid/package.json Full

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#964218: node-yarnpkg: autopkgtest fails with node-uuid 8.2 from experimental - "Cannot read property 'v4' of undefined"

2020-07-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-yarnpkg Version: 1.22.4-3 Severity: important Full build log is attached. This was run in a clean and uptodate lxc container using salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta/build script. autopkgtest [18:26:50]: version 5.10 autopkgtest [18:26:50]: host ilvala2; command line:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#964218: Bug#964218: Bug#964218: node-yarnpkg: autopkgtest fails with node-uuid 8.2 from experimental - "Cannot read property 'v4' of undefined"

2020-07-04 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജൂലൈ 4 2:39:27 AM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote: >Updating that dependency is already in upsream's TODO list >https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/6829 >.. but they seem to lag on updating dependencies. > >I guess it would require fixing against this breaking change:

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-katex_0.10.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-07-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:41, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:40 pm, Sean Whitton wrote: Thanks. I think at this point we probably need to wait to hear from Bastian, who processed the REJECT. In the meantime, it would be good to reupload with the reason

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#964218: Bug#964218: Bug#964218: node-yarnpkg: autopkgtest fails with node-uuid 8.2 from experimental - "Cannot read property 'v4' of undefined"

2020-07-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 23:09, Paolo Greppi wrote: Updating that dependency is already in upsream's TODO list https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/6829 .. but they seem to lag on updating dependencies. I guess it would require fixing against this breaking change:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#963761: Bug#963761: Bug#963761: Bug#963761: Bug#963761: Bug#963761: node-node-sass: missing versioned dependency relation?: Sass could not find a binding for your current en

2020-07-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:52, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I think that when we declare only¹ lower bounds, we do avoid the biggest headache of nodejs failing to transition - and reduce the problem to each package requiring a binNMU being flagged as such. Please others chime in if you think I

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-katex_0.10.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-06-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജൂൺ 23 2:56:37 AM IST, Sean Whitton wrote: >Hello Pirate, > >On Mon 22 Jun 2020 at 12:58AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > >> We usually use Provides instead of splitting when we can remove the Depends >> on the interpreter. For example node-clipboard pro

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-katex_0.10.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-06-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:40 pm, Sean Whitton wrote: Hello, On Tue 23 Jun 2020 at 01:47AM +02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Sean Whitton (2020-06-22 23:26:37) Would someone want to use libjs-katex without nodejs installed? Yes: Pandoc can produce output which uses katex rendered

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#962039: Bug#962037: Plan B for not being able to replicate upstream exports exactly

2020-06-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജൂൺ 16 7:46:01 AM IST, Daniel Ring wrote: >Control: reopen 962037 >Control: reopen 962039 > >Sorry about closing the bugs early, I'm used to close-on-commit instead >of close-on-release and I forgot Debian handles things differently. I >updated Rainloop's changelog on Salsa to

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Plan B for not being able to replicate upstream exports exactly

2020-06-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
to the Rainloop repository on salsa.d.o. Rainloop now builds successfully on current unstable with node-less from experimental. Thanks, I can upload it to unstable. -- Daniel On 6/5/2020 9:02 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:11 pm, Pirate Praveen  wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2020

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Plan B for not being able to replicate upstream exports exactly

2020-06-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:07 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: You don't have to upload broken packages to unstable. You can wait till less.js lands in unstable to upload your changes to experimental. The idea is to give you a chance to fix your package before it actually breaks. Also please

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#962039: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Plan B for not being able to replicate upstream exports exactly

2020-06-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:07 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: Please don't invent your own methods and follow the standards used by the rest of the team. If everyone invents their own methods to embed, that makes it unnecessarily hard to collaborate as a team. I don't think the rest of the js

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-katex_0.10.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-06-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജൂൺ 21 10:17:57 PM IST, Sean Whitton wrote: >[speaking as an FTP team member, not ctte member, though this is *not* >an official statement made on behalf of the whole FTP team] > >Hello Jonas, > >On Sun 21 Jun 2020 at 10:48AM +02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> Could you please elaborate

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-katex_0.10.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-06-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
ainer has consciously >> chosen to use a binary package split to solve a problem and that's a >> reasonable way to go about solving the problem, we'll sign off on it. > >Thanks for the clarification, Sean. > >I think that was quite helpful. I will let Pirate Praveen continue fro

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-katex_0.10.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-06-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജൂൺ 19 1:40:09 AM IST, Bastian Blank wrote: > >The introduces an unnecessary split into katex and libjs-katex. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934948#54 * User-facing executable programs associated with a library should usually be packaged in a non-library binary

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-babel 6 removal

2020-06-04 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, മേയ് 21 1:08:32 PM IST, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > >On 2020, മേയ് 21 2:34:43 AM IST, Xavier wrote: >>Hi all, >> >>here is the current result given by dak. Still to fix: >> * libjs-webrtc-adapter > >This can be fixed by switching from browserif

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Plan B for not being able to replicate upstream exports exactly

2020-06-05 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reassign -1 rainloop Control: retitle -1 rainloop ftbfs with node-less 3.11.2 in experimental On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:27 am, Pirate Praveen wrote: We could try building rainloop with npm version of less 3.11.2 to confirm if it is rainloop that needs updating or less that needs

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Plan B for not being able to replicate upstream exports exactly

2020-06-05 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:36 am, Pirate Praveen wrote: I have reproduced the same error with less npm dist tarball in embed-less-npm-dist-tar branch of rainloop in salsa, so reassigning back to rainloop. [05:52:23] Finished 'lightgalleryFontsCopy' after 497 ms [05:52:23] Finished

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Plan B for not being able to replicate upstream exports exactly

2020-06-05 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:54 am, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:36 am, Pirate Praveen wrote: I have reproduced the same error with less npm dist tarball in embed-less-npm-dist-tar branch of rainloop in salsa, so reassigning back to rainloop. [05:52:23] Finished

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Plan B for not being able to replicate upstream exports exactly

2020-06-05 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 3:10 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: This is likely broken by node-merge-stream update from 1.0 to 2.0. node-merge-stream is a build dependeny of node-autolinker. Tried building with autolinker 3.x in embed-autolinker-3 branch, but the same failure. I tried to run

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Plan B for not being able to replicate upstream exports exactly

2020-06-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:29 am, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 10:33 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: I'm trying to close the gap between upstream build and our builds by using rollup to generate cjs file as well, but build fails with this error. /usr/bin/node -e

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Bug#962037: Plan B for not being able to replicate upstream exports exactly

2020-06-05 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:11 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 3:10 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: This is likely broken by node-merge-stream update from 1.0 to 2.0. node-merge-stream is a build dependeny of node-autolinker. Tried building with autolinker 3.x in embed

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#965173: Bug#965173: node-rollup-plugin-buble build depends on the babeljs provides that will not be in bullseye

2020-07-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജൂലൈ 17 12:12:09 PM IST, Adrian Bunk wrote: >Source: node-rollup-plugin-buble >Version: 0.19.8-2 >Severity: serious >Tags: ftbfs >Control: block 960748 by -1 > >node-rollup-plugin-buble build depends on the babeljs provides >that will not be in bullseye due to #960748. I think we

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#965353: Bug#965353: node-babel7 FTBFS: babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node/src/index.js: isArray is not defined

2020-07-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 19:35, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 09:55:47PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: I'm wondering if this will require another bootstraping cycle as node-babel7 autopkgtest is also broken and it depends on itself. If the problem is in node-lodash and gets

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#965353: Bug#965353: node-babel7 FTBFS: babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node/src/index.js: isArray is not defined

2020-07-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
I'm wondering if this will require another bootstraping cycle as node-babel7 autopkgtest is also broken and it depends on itself. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: node-babel7 FTBFS: babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node/src/index.js: isArray is not defined

2020-07-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 22:24, Pirate Praveen wrote: Babel build situation is indeed a mess. It is even worse than I estimated. We can no longer build it with npm DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=pkg.node-babel7.npm sbuild ... HOME=`pwd` npm i npm ERR! code EUNSUPPORTEDPROTOCOL npm ERR! Unsupported

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-less-loader_5.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-07-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 21:10, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hi, according to LICENSE the copyright holder is "JS Foundation and other contributors". Probably upstream can shed some light on this. Fixed an reuploaded. npm2deb takes Author in package.json as copyright holder by default,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: node-babel7 FTBFS: babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node/src/index.js: isArray is not defined

2020-07-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജൂലൈ 27 1:42:32 AM IST, Nicolas Mora wrote: >I'm not sure yet if this would fix the bug but in all the build log >errors, I see that the file /usr/share/nodejs/lodash/_baseOrderBy.js is >always the source of the error. > >The file _baseOrderBy.js in the package seems buggy for an

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: node-babel7 FTBFS: babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node/src/index.js: isArray is not defined

2020-07-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reopen -1 On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 00:32, Pirate Praveen wrote: This did not fix the issue :( So we have to reopen this bug once the upload reaches the archive (which will close this bug as fixed). Thanks to the brave new world of embedding eveything and reducing the number of js

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: node-babel7 FTBFS: babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node/src/index.js: isArray is not defined

2020-07-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 22:43, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 22:24, Pirate Praveen wrote: Babel build situation is indeed a mess. It is even worse than I estimated. We can no longer build it with npm DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=pkg.node-babel7.npm sbuild ... HOME=`pwd` npm i

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-markdown-it_10.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-07-27 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജൂലൈ 12 11:30:09 AM IST, Sean Whitton wrote: > >+--+ >| REJECT reasoning | >+--+ > >test/fixtures/commonmark/spec.txt is under a different license. Fixed and reuploaded. >+--+ >|Other comments|

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: Bug#965353: node-babel7 FTBFS: babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node/src/index.js: isArray is not defined

2020-07-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/lodash-archive/lodash-cli/pull/141 On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 16:12, Nicolas Mora wrote: I'm not sure yet if this would fix the bug but in all the build log errors, I see that the file /usr/share/nodejs/lodash/_baseOrderBy.js is always the source of

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#978123: node-postcss-filter-plugins: broken with node-postcss 8.x

2020-12-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-postcss-filter-plugins Version: 2.0.2-3 Severity: serious autopkgtest fails with stderr output postcss.plugin was deprecated. Migration guide: https://evilmartians.com/chronicles/postcss-8-plugin-migration This was reported on the team mailing list [1] and tracked in postcss 8

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#978127: make it easy to specify autopkgtest restrictions in pkg-js-tools

2020-12-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: pkg-js-tools,node-css-loader Severity: wishlist node-css-loader autopkgtest fails because of a deprecation warning in stderr. In manual autopkgtest, we can easily add Restrictions: allow-stderr, provide a way to pass this to autopkgtest-pkg-nodejs tests too. -- Pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#978608: node-rollup-plugin-node-resolve: Update to new upstream version 11.x

2020-12-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-rollup-plugin-node-resolve Version: 10.0.0+repack+~4.2.4-1 severity: important At least autoprefixer-rails build is broken with version 10. https://github.com/ai/autoprefixer-rails/pull/200#issuecomment-751924645 Probably more builds are silently broken. While at it, I think we

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#960901: Buffer is a built-in node function

2020-12-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 20:02, Ben Finney wrote: Control: found -1 webpack/4.43.0-6 On 16-Jun-2020, Ben Finney wrote: On 18-May-2020, Pirate Praveen wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-clone/-/blob/master/clone.js#L109 > I think we may need to embed older version of

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#978127: Bug#978127: Bug#978127: make it easy to specify autopkgtest restrictions in pkg-js-tools

2020-12-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reassign -1 node-css-loader Control: retitle -1 autopkgtest regression due to stderr On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 10:50, Xavier wrote: Le 26/12/2020 à 10:45, Pirate Praveen a écrit : Package: pkg-js-tools,node-css-loader Severity: wishlist node-css-loader autopkgtest fails because

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977900: node-autoprefixer: FTBFS: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'path'

2020-12-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, 25 Dec 2020 20:58:20 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > Now with updated @rollup/plugin-node-resolve > > (debian-sid)pravi@ilvala2:~/forge/js-team/autoprefixer-rails-10.1.0.0/build$ > yarnpkg upgrade @rollup/plugin-node-resolve@^10.0.0 > yarn upgrade v1.22.10 > [1/4]

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Removing legacy rollup-plugin-node-resolve module

2020-12-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi, I'd like to remove embedded copy of rollup-plugin-node-resolve from bullseye and port all modules to use @rollup/plugin-node-resolve I have rebuilt all the reverse dependencies and you can see the list of packages that failed at

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Yarnpkg future

2021-01-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 7:54 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: I'm trying to build corepack and it is progressing well. We will need to package some dependencies (clipanion, terser-webpack-plugin, ts-loader etc). I will report how it goes as I make progress. Good news. I got a working yarn 2 build

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#979531: lodash/fp does not have all the files shipped by npm dist.tarball

2021-01-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-lodash Version: 4.17.20+dfsg+~cs8.31.172-1 Severity: important Control: affects -1 gitlab Control: tags -1 help gitlab package from salsa master-13.5 branch fails with this error during installation. ERROR in /environments/components/environments_table.vue?vue=script=js&

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#949243: Unable to reproduce

2020-11-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:11:25 +0100 Xavier wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Hi, > > I'm unable to reproduce this bug after many tries > > DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=nocheck sbuild is failing for node-vinyl-fs in sid as well. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

2020-12-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 11:37, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Sorry, I was unclear. Let me try rephrase to clarify: ftpmaster strongly dislikes (i.e. they will reject) too tiny source packages, but ftpmaster does not actively encourage (even if they might tolerate) duplicate code. My point was

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] please file ITP bugreport to track new packages

2020-12-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 11:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Please use Debbugs... Debian has an issue tracker called debbugs. Despite its name it can also track other kinds of issues than bugs, including the interest and eventual preliminary work preparing a new package, before the package is

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976081: Bug#976081: Bug#976081: yarnpkg: Provide prebuilt yarnpkg in contrib

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:39:18 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 00:28, Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 19:46, Paolo Greppi > > wrote: > >> The resulting package was not installable due to n

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974069: Bug#974069: error Yarn hasn't been able to find a cache folder it can use although folders are writable

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: fixed -1 1.22.4-4 On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 22:00:53 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > This is caused by node-mkdirp transition, but node-yarnpkg is ftbfs currently (caused by node-babel/node-babel7 transition) which makes it hard to fix. Fixed in last uplod. -- Pkg-javascript-de

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#972952: Bug#972952: node-mkdirp 1.0 is incompatible with 0.5, breaks yarnpkg

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: fixed -1 1.22.4-4 On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:41:34 +0100 Xavier wrote: > migration from mkdirp 0.53 to 1.0.x is easy but I'm not able to patch > yarnpkg since build already fails for some babel reasons. This is fixed in the last upload, though we need to build it using

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974587: node-uuid: Bad "exports" field?

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:25:14 +0100 Xavier Guimard wrote: > node-uuid breaks dependent package with error like: > > Package subpath './v1' is not defined by "exports" in /usr/share/nodejs/uuid/package.json > > (same error with any of v{1,2,3,4}.js) I have seen similar error in gitlab as

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974587: node-uuid: Bad "exports" field?

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 18:25:26 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > I suspect this is caused when a package is expecting an older version > of uuid, for example node-copy-webpack-plugin, which expects uuid 3.x. I think uuid itself had a bug, with uuid 8.3.1, I don't see this issue now.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#964218: Bug#964218: Bug#964218: node-yarnpkg: autopkgtest fails with node-uuid 8.2 from experimental - "Cannot read property 'v4' of undefined"

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reassign -1 node-copy-webpack-plugin On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 15:43:19 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > I tried fixing this in babel6 branch (as master is broken - I found it > broke after merging babel 7 branch), but autopkgtest still fails with > the same error. Can you che

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#964218: fixed in node-copy-webpack-plugin 5.1.2+~cs9.0.2-2

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reopen -1 Control: reassign -1 gitlab On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:49:55 + Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Source: node-copy-webpack-plugin > Source-Version: 5.1.2+~cs9.0.2-2 > Done: Pirate Praveen > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974587: Re: node-uuid: Bad "exports" field?

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 23:00:56 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > So if we fix node-request to work with newer uuid or probably remove > the dependency on node-request in yarnpkg, I hope we can fix this issue. I have fixed node-request to work with uuid 8.x API and yarnpkg is fixed now.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#974587: Bug#974587: Re: node-uuid: Bad "exports" field?

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reassign -1 node-request Control: fixed -1 2.88-5 On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 23:27, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 23:00:56 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > So if we fix node-request to work with newer uuid or probably remove > the dependency on node-request in yarnpkg,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

2020-12-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 19:17, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: My understanding is that ftpmasters dislike small *source* packages. Small source packages is a burden in *every* package tracking in Debian. Small binary packages is also a burden in *some* package tracking. Zero-size binary packages

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976310: Bug#976310: node-compression-webpack-plugin: TypeError: (0 , _schemaUtils.validate) is not a function

2020-12-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reopen -1 Control: reassign -1 gitlab On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:14, Xavier wrote: Does gitlab use `npm install` ? If so, we just have to fix node-compression-webpack-plugin/package.json This is indeed caused by mix of schema-utils 2 and 3. Version 2 is pulled by yarn and version 3

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976331: Bug#976331: [JS Policy] what to set in "Provides" field ?

2020-12-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 3 10:03:18 PM IST, Xavier wrote: >I'm not in favor of your proposal: if I need a node-very-few-module >which is provided by a package with many dependencies, I'm not happy to >depend on it. To apply that, we should then choose with precaution in >which package we will embed each

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976440: pkg-js-tools: add a minimal test to check the dependencies in package.json does not differ by major versions

2020-12-05 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: pkg-js-tools Version: 0.9.53 Severity: wishlist It would be nice to have a test in pkg-js-tools to make sure the dependencies mentioned in package.json of a module is not differing by a major version. Example node-css-loader. See

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976615: please provide /usr/share/nodejs/pdfjs-dist

2020-12-05 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: pdf.js version: 2.6.347+dfsg-2 severity: wishlist There is a node module pdfjs-dist https://www.npmjs.com/package/pdfjs-dist which includes a prebuilt version of pdf.js. gitlab needs this (currently it is pulled from npmjs.com via yarn), so it would be good if pdfjs-dist can be

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-uuid 8.x transition

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
hi, I have fixed node-request to work with node-uuid 8 API and it also fixed yarnpkg/gitlab. I'd like to upload node-uuid 8.x to unstable in the coming days. Help is welcome to ensure every package is fixed with this version. Please see the patch in node-request for how to do it. Also uuid 8

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-uuid 8.x transition

2020-12-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 8 10:53:26 AM IST, Andrius Merkys wrote: >Hello, > >On 2020-12-07 20:46, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> I have fixed node-request to work with node-uuid 8 API and it also fixed >> yarnpkg/gitlab. > >Does this mean node-request is going to be part of bull

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-uuid 8.x transition

2020-12-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 00:16, Pirate Praveen wrote: I think we should also rebuild reverse dependencies too, I did a rebuild and here is the results, rebuild node-ajv-keywords... PASS autopkgtest node-redis ... PASS autopkgtest node-request

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-uuid 8.x transition

2020-12-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Thanks for raising that concern, Andrius. An RC bug has already been filed for that purpose, however: bug#956423. I did not see an auto removal notice against it at tracker.debian.org so I thought the severity might be lower than rc.

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976861: node-fastcgi: ftbfs with node-uuid 8.x in experimental

2020-12-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-fastcgi Version: 1.3.3-3 Severity: important Control: block 956423 by -1 Control: tags -1 patch Error [ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED]: Package subpath './v4' is not defined by "exports" in /usr/share/nodejs/uuid/package.json Full log attached. This is caused by embedded copy of

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-uuid 8.x transition

2020-12-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 19:44, Pirate Praveen wrote: autopkgtest node-copy-webpack-plugin ... FAIL rebuild node-copy-webpack-plugin ... FAIL rebuild node-fastcgi ... FAIL rebuild node-http-signature ... FAIL autopkgtest node-node-rest-client... FAIL

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#949243: Bug#949243: Unable to reproduce

2020-11-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 13:32, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Just a note: On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 04:55:02PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=nocheck sbuild If you sepcify nocheck in _PROFILES you also *MUST* specify nocheck in _OPTIONS. See the relevant line in https

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] acorn_8.0.4+ds+~cs19.19.27-1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2020-12-09 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 18:24, Debian FTP Masters wrote: There was an uncaught exception when processing your upload: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 109, in _install_file

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976155: Bug#976155: yarnpkg: depends on obsolete virtual node-node-uuid

2020-11-30 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 19:35, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Btw, it seems you need to push latest changes to git for yarnpkg The recent changes are in master-1 branch as we could not fix the master branch (attempted to build with babel 7 without success). -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976155: Bug#976155: yarnpkg: depends on obsolete virtual node-node-uuid

2020-11-30 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 18:32, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Package: yarnpkg Version: 1.22.4-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 yarnpkg depends on node-node-uuid. node-node-uuid was deprecated 2 yars ago, replaced by

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976081: Bug#976081: Bug#976081: yarnpkg: Provide prebuilt yarnpkg in contrib

2020-11-30 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 00:28, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 19:46, Paolo Greppi wrote: The resulting package was not installable due to node-babel-runtime missing from testing May be we can add babel-runtime as a component? (it is going to contrib anyway) Or see

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976081: Bug#976081: yarnpkg: Provide prebuilt yarnpkg in contrib

2020-11-30 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 19:46, Paolo Greppi wrote: On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 18:02:16 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -2 "Provide prebuilt yarnpkg in contrib" On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 22:07, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> 3. Build it using

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976310: node-compression-webpack-plugin: TypeError: (0 , _schemaUtils.validate) is not a function

2020-12-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-compression-webpack-plugin Version: 3.0.1-3 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 gitlab Installation of gitlab started failing with the following error. I think this is related to the recent update of node-schema-utils. Webpacking...

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976310: Bug#976310: node-compression-webpack-plugin: TypeError: (0 , _schemaUtils.validate) is not a function

2020-12-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:14, Xavier wrote: _schemaUtils.validate *is* a function when using schema-utils ≥ 3. Problem is probably somewhere else Does gitlab use `npm install` ? If so, we just have to fix node-compression-webpack-plugin/package.json yes, it uses yarnpkg install. Can

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976310: Bug#976310: node-compression-webpack-plugin: TypeError: (0 , _schemaUtils.validate) is not a function

2020-12-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:13, Xavier wrote: _schemaUtils.validate *is* a function when using schema-utils ≥ 3. Problem is probably somewhere else I think it is because css-loader is installed from npm which would pull node-schema-loader 2.x. I could not get node-css-loader working last

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#973741: Bug#973741: gitlab: Yarn hasn't been able to find a cache folder it can use

2020-11-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 23:50:24 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 18:58, Xavier wrote: > > we opened bugs to upstream repo and are waiting for... > > I don't think upstream will make any significant changes to 1.x branch > any more. Someone who wa

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#973741: Bug#973741: gitlab: Yarn hasn't been able to find a cache folder it can use

2020-11-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -2 "Provide prebuilt yarnpkg in contrib" On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 22:07, Paolo Greppi wrote: 3. Build it using 'deb https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20200502T085134Z sid main' (the last version that builds in sid) and embed the built files in

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#976081: Bug#973741: gitlab: Yarn hasn't been able to find a cache folder it can use

2020-11-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: reopen -1 Control: notfixed -1 1.22.4-4 On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 18:02:16 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > I have a created a new branch master-contrib in salsa and pushed my > changes. > Please review the changes and if it looks good, we can upload it. Also > we can move thi

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977311: node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin: dead upstream since July 2019

2020-12-14 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 21:30:41 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > It seems this package has only one reverse dependency (webpack) and two > reverse build-dependencies (node-chai and node-webpack). > > Seems it is time to replace this package with its successor, >

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977485: @babel/standalone modules is empty

2020-12-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-babel7 Version: 7.12.10+~cs150.141.83-1 Severity: wishlist Currently it only has package.json in /usr/share/nodejs/@babel/standalone I'd like to use it for @gitlab/ui module. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-yarnpkg_1.22.4-6_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-12-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:41, Xavier wrote: Hi, I still see one problem: yarnpkg seems to depends on node-babel-plugin-transform-strict-mode Thanks for checking, with babel-plugin-transform-inline-imports-commonjs removed, we can remove this build dependency. I will remove it in the

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#958687: node-request-promise: Remove dependency to node-request

2020-12-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:22:49 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > node-request-promise has no reverse (build) dependencies, so I think we > can request removal. Filed request for removal from archive. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#914509: [request] contains unnecessary embedded copy of node-uuid

2020-12-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: fixed -1 2.88.1-3 On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:26:26 +0100 Paolo Greppi wrote: > This package contains an embedded copy of node-uuid 3.3.2 which is unnecessary now that we have it in the archive: > https://packages.debian.org/sid/node-uuid > > The embedded copy should be removed and a

[Pkg-javascript-devel] help with node-vue-style-loader autopkgtest and jest

2020-12-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi, The tests are running fine for node-vue-style-loader during build but it fails during autopkgtest because the module is shipping esm files directly. It has a .babelrc file which jest uses during build to transform the modules, but during autopkgtest, lib is a symlink to

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977232: babeljs-node is unable to find system modules

2020-12-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: retitle -1 missing dependency node-environment-flags Control: clone -1 -2 Control: retitle -2 node-yargs missing dependency on node-define-property Control: reassign -2 node-yargs On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 02:06:42 +0530 Pirate Praveen > When trying to run mocha using babeljs-node comm

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977234: node-vue-style-loader: enable autopkgtest

2020-12-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-vue-style-loader Version: 4.1.2-1 severity: wishlist As continuation of https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2020-December/048394.html I tried running the test with babeljs-node after embedding missing node-environment-flags in debian/test/test_modules

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977232: babeljs-node is unable to find system modules

2020-12-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-babel7 Version: 7.12.9+~cs150.130.99-1 Severity: important When trying to run mocha using babeljs-node command, it fails to find the modules installed in global nodejs directories. pravi@mahishi:~/forge/js-team/node-window-size$ babeljs-node /usr/bin/mocha -R spec

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977962: webpack: mkdirp > 1 patch seems broken

2020-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: webpack,node-compression-webpack-plugin Version: 4.43.0-6 Severity: serious To reproduce this issue, run jest --ci test/CompressionPlugin.test.js in node-compression-webpack-plugin ● CompressionPlugin › should work and show compress assets in stats TypeError: callback must be a

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977962: Bug#977962: Bug#977962: Bug#977962: webpack: mkdirp > 1 patch seems broken

2020-12-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 16:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: memfs? Is Nodejs module "memfs" in Debian, or are you talking about something else here? memfs is used by compression-webpack-plugin for tests, but it is not yet packaged. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977900: node-autoprefixer: FTBFS: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'path'

2020-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: tags -1 pending On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:25:36 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > debian/autoprefixer.js → dist/autoprefixer.js... > [!] Error: Could not load path (imported by ./../usr/share/nodejs/postcss/lib/map-generator.js): ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'path' > Error:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#978014: node-schema-utils: missing dependency

2020-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-schema-utils Version: 3.0.0-3 Severity: important schema-utils mentions "@types/json-schema": "^7.0.6" as a dependency in its package.json but it is not available in debian. It should probably be added to node-json-schema and added as a dependency to node-schema-utils. --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977688: node-css-loader: please embed additional postcss extensions

2020-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: block -1 by 977900 Control: tag 977900 help On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 23:21:20 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > I'd like to update css-loader to latest upstream release/postcss 8 > transition before I work on this. node-postcss 8 transition is blocked by an ftbfs bug in node-autopr

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#940704: Bug#940704: some tests do pass

2020-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 19:50, Paolo Greppi wrote: I have run jest in the yarnpkg source tree with: jest --ci __tests__/ You can add this to debian/tests/pkg-js/test having this jest.config.js to disable failing tests: and include this as a patch. module.exports = { testURL:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#978033: node-autoprefixer: build ruby-autoprefixer-rails binary

2020-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: node-autoprefixer Version: 10.1.0+~cs11.3.2.0-1 Severity: wishlist Now node-autoprefixer includes autoprefixer-rails as a component in source package (for its build directory). We can build ruby-autoprefixer-rails binary package from the same source and drop libjs-autoprefixer (there

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-postcss 7.x -> 8.x transition - work started in experimental

2020-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:01 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi, I have uploaded node-postcss 8.0.5-1 to experimental. I have started https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Transitions/PostCSS8 to track progress of this transition. Help is welcome. With all reverse dependencies fixed

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#971271: rainloop: ftbfs with node-postcss 8.0 in experimental

2020-12-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: retitle rainloop: ftbfs with node-postcss 8.0 Control: severity -1 serious On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 21:21:26 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > > node-postcss 8.x will be uploaded to unstable when node-css-loader is > ready (there is already an upstream pull request and hopef

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977670: Bug#977670: jest: should explicitly (build-)depend on needed babel modules

2020-12-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 17:28, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Package: jest Version: 26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-2 Followup-For: Bug #977670 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Control: reoen -1 Control: retitle -1 jest: should explicitly (build-)depend on needed babel modules Thanks

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >