node-fs.realpath_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-fs.realpath_1.0.0-1.dsc
node-fs.realpath_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz
node-fs.realpath_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
node-fs.realpath_1.0.0-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 node-once
Bug #841274 [node-once] node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a
lot of packages to FTBFS
Bug #841321 [node-once] node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a
lot of packages to FTBFS
Bug #841322 [node-once] node-once:
control: reassign -1 node-once
Its caused by node-once missing dependency on node-wrappy
> make[1]: Entering directory
> '/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20161019103506.HYMipgpTLB.db.node-define-property/node-define-property-0.2.5'
> mocha
> module.js:327
> throw err;
> ^
>
> Error:
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 01:57:17 +0200
Source: nodejs
Binary: nodejs-dev nodejs nodejs-dbg nodejs-legacy
Architecture: source
Version: 6.9.1~dfsg-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript
nodejs_6.9.1~dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nodejs_6.9.1~dfsg-1.dsc
nodejs_6.9.1~dfsg.orig.tar.gz
nodejs_6.9.1~dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
Pkg-javascript-devel
Hi,
attached is a fix for the mips-epoll_pwait.diff patch file.
The exiting patch file removes zeroing sigmask, but does not zero
sigset, the replacement of sigmask.
This causes sigset to hold bogus data and causes a hang.
The attached patch fixes this by moving the zeroing of sigset to
The sigset used by this patch is only initialized if SIGPROF is added to
it, so the signal mask is indeterminate in most cases.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net
unix,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 841274 + patch
Bug #841274 [node-once] node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a
lot of packages to FTBFS
Bug #841321 [node-once] node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a
lot of packages to FTBFS
Bug #841322
tags 841274 + patch
thanks
Trivial patch attached.
(Not that I know anything about node, this is just the message from
Bas but translated to patch).
Thanks.--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Package: node-once
Architecture: all
Depends:
${misc:Depends}
+ ,
reassign 841274 node-once
found 841274 1.4.0-1
retitle 841274 node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a lot of
packages to FTBFS
thanks
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:47:35PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote:
> > If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 841274 node-once
Bug #841274 [node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot
find module 'wrappy'
Bug #841321 [node-define-property] node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot
find module wrappy)
Bug #841322
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote:
> If anybody reading this could tell me how we arrived at having so many
> one-day-old unbuildable packages in unstable, I'm still curious about it.
Because node-once was updated to a new upstream release which now
requires
Package: libuv1
Version: 1.9.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
This issue was found during compilation of moar on arm64 where the packaging
process is killed after 150mns of inactivity [1]. moar is built on top on
libuv1.
Long story [2] short, moar hangs randomly while waiting for a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 841274 0.2.5-1
Bug #841274 [node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot
find module 'wrappy'
Bug #841321 [node-define-property] node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot
find module wrappy)
Bug #841322
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 841274 node-define-property
Bug #841274 [src:node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error:
Cannot find module 'wrappy'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-define-property' to
'node-define-property'.
No longer marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 841274 841321 841322 841323 841324 841325 841326 841327 841328
> 841329 841330 841331 841332 841333 841334 841335 841336 841337 841338
Bug #841274 [src:node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error:
Cannot find module
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 841321 node-define-property
Bug #841321 [src:node-collection-visit] node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error:
Cannot find module wrappy)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-collection-visit' to
'node-define-property'.
No longer marked as
Santiago Vila wrote:
> Thanks and sorry for the noise.
Really don't worry about it; was just an FYI. :)
> Assuming that this one is the real cause for all the bugs I reported,
> I'm going to merge them all into this one.
Awesome - great work.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Chris Lamb wrote:
> affects 841274 node-is-accessor-descriptor node-is-descriptor
> node-is-extendable node-is-number node-to-regex-range
> thanks
Hi.
The quoted text above is the reason I didn't see any of those bugs.
I was looking here:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:17:20PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > node-repeat-element: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)
>
> This (and others) appears to be a duplicate of #841274. I used
> "affects" there, perhaps incorrectly, but at least it avoids
> duplicates.
Do you mean
FYI: The status of the node-prelude-ls source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.1.2+dfsg-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times
Hi,
> node-repeat-element: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)
This (and others) appears to be a duplicate of #841274. I used
"affects" there, perhaps incorrectly, but at least it avoids
duplicates.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org /
Package: src:node-copy-descriptor
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-glob-parent
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-isobject
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-hosted-git-info
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-pascalcase
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-is-dotfile
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-filename-regex
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-isexe
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-has-values
Version: 0.1.4-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-collection-visit
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-map-cache
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:52:50 +0200
with message-id <20161019155250.i6n2tydvt3ovulpy@nuc>
and subject line Re: Bug#841320: node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot
find module wrappy)
has caused the Debian Bug report #841320,
regarding node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot
Package: src:node-component-emitter
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-repeat-element
Version: 1.1.2+github-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-is-primitive
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-fill-range
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-extend-shallow
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-collection-visit
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 841274 node-collection-visit node-component-emitter
> node-copy-descriptor node-extend-shallow node-has-values node-isobject
> node-map-visit node-repeat-element
Bug #841274 [src:node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error:
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:46:56 +0530
Source: node-pify
Binary: node-pify
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Package: jison
Version: 0.4.17+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy ยง2.2.1
This package is in main, but it depends on node-ebnf-parser and node-cjson,
which are both in contrib.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Doesn't mention joylent (?). Please clarify and re-upload.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
affects 841274 node-is-accessor-descriptor node-is-descriptor
node-is-extendable node-is-number node-to-regex-range
thanks
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 841274 node-is-accessor-descriptor node-is-descriptor
> node-is-extendable node-is-number node-to-regex-range
Bug #841274 [src:node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error:
Cannot find module 'wrappy'
Added indication that
Source: node-define-property
Version: 0.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
node-define-property fails to build from source
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:08:52 +0530
Source: node-map-cache
Binary: node-map-cache
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:43:36 +0530
Source: node-normalize-path
Binary: node-normalize-path
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:25:01 +0530
Source: node-pascalcase
Binary: node-pascalcase
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:49:47 +0530
Source: node-signal-exit
Binary: node-signal-exit
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 01:50:58 +0200
Source: node-map-obj
Binary: node-map-obj
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:47:23 +0530
Source: node-camelcase
Binary: node-camelcase
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:49:38 +0200
Source: node-klaw
Binary: node-klaw
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:29:37 +0530
Source: node-is-dotfile
Binary: node-is-dotfile
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:16:20 +0530
Source: node-glob-parent
Binary: node-glob-parent
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:18:16 +0530
Source: node-inflight
Binary: node-inflight
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:32:20 +0530
Source: node-isexe
Binary: node-isexe
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:54:09 +0530
Source: node-filename-regex
Binary: node-filename-regex
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 12:47:41 +0530
Source: node-concat-map
Binary: node-concat-map
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 22:12:23 +0530
Source: node-hosted-git-info
Binary: node-hosted-git-info
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:40:03 +0530
Source: node-balanced-match
Binary: node-balanced-match
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Package: node-fill-range
Severity: minor
Hi,
the package description now has the short description (single line
synopsis) that continues in the long description.
As a result the long description is not a complete sentence (and also
does not have an ending period ".").
This goes against section
63 matches
Mail list logo