Le lundi 30 juin 2014 à 18:59 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
from #debian-multimedia
fsateler andrewrk: why did you remove the ncp binary?
andrewrk fsateler, it clutters up the global bin namespace, and why would
you ever use it instead of plain old cp ?
it doesn't clutter the namespace,
Le mardi 01 juillet 2014 à 04:58 +, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:59:03 -0700, Andrew Kelley wrote:
from #debian-multimedia
fsateler andrewrk: why did you remove the ncp binary?
andrewrk fsateler, it clutters up the global bin namespace, and why
would you ever
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2014-07-01 16:35:59)
Andrew, modifications you make to the upstream files are supposed to
be done in one of two ways (and directly removing files from the gbp
repository is not a way):
- repackage upstream tarball to exclude files for DFSG reasons
The simplest way to
from #debian-multimedia
fsateler andrewrk: why did you remove the ncp binary?
andrewrk fsateler, it clutters up the global bin namespace, and why would
you ever use it instead of plain old cp ?
andrewrk it seems common for node module authors to include useless
binaries with their libraries
