Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-09 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശനി 10 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 12:10 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > node-bl has been updated so node-tar-stream should be OK now ! You should commit tarballs with this name node-tar-stream_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz (you committed node-tar-stream-1.5.2.tar.gz). I have fixed it and uploaded, please remember this

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-09 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 04/12/2016 10:06, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ഞായര്‍ 04 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:18 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> It should be low risk to upgrade because the command: >> apt-cache rdepends node-bl >> >> returns: >> >> node-bl >> Reverse Depends: >> node-yawl >> >> The latter has a FTBFS big open for

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-04 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ഞായര്‍ 04 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 02:18 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > It should be low risk to upgrade because the command: > apt-cache rdepends node-bl > > returns: > > node-bl > Reverse Depends: > node-yawl > > The latter has a FTBFS big open for about a year, git repo is basically > stuck in

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-04 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 03/12/2016 17:59, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On വെള്ളി 02 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:30 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> I guess we can put this one on hold and wait for node-end-of-stream so >> that tests can be enabled as well. > > node-end-of-stream is in the archive, but pristine-tar data is missing. >

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെള്ളി 02 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:30 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote: > I guess we can put this one on hold and wait for node-end-of-stream so > that tests can be enabled as well. node-end-of-stream is in the archive, but pristine-tar data is missing. Please push pristine-tar branch. signature.asc

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-02 Thread Paolo Greppi
On 02/12/2016 10:12, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 2 2:36:04 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> OK BTW on this one when I tried to reopen the ITP #753287 the BTS >> replied "nope, the bug is archived!" >> >> So what is best here ? To unarchive it or to open a

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] RFS: node-tar-stream 1.5.2

2016-12-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 2 2:36:04 PM IST, Paolo Greppi wrote: >OK BTW on this one when I tried to reopen the ITP #753287 the BTS >replied "nope, the bug is archived!" > >So what is best here ? To unarchive it or to open a new one ? > I see the main purpose of ITP as way for