Hi,
according to [1] we have
After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
processed until after the release.
So that transition is way too late, and the result is that libv8 3.10.8
should be uploaded to experimental instead.
Closing this bug.
Regards,
Jérémy.
[1]
On 12-06-17 at 12:06pm, Jérémy Lal wrote:
according to [1] we have
After Sunday the 20th of May, any new transitions are likely not to be
processed until after the release.
So that transition is way too late, and the result is that libv8 3.10.8
should be uploaded to experimental instead.
Hi team,
2012/6/17 Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st:
This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer
This is more of an FYI to you that I've now officially started my
application to become a DM, not a request for you to advocate for me,
as I know we haven't worked a lot
Hi Emilien,
On 12-06-17 at 04:29pm, Emilien Klein wrote:
This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer
URL:http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer.
I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and
Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them.
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id 20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676736,
regarding node-mapnik: FTBFS: parse.hpp:155:9: internal compiler error:
Your message dated Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:49:40 +0200
with message-id 20120617204940.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info
and subject line not reproducible in a more recent rebuild, closing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #676033,
regarding node-stringprep: FTBFS: (.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main'
