Hi Thorsten,
Thanks for finally rejecting packages too small to meet the criteria.
On 07/12/2015 01:00 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> this has the same problem as node-isarray ...
What about node-nextback?
It is required for node-gaze along with node-absolute-path to fix #784350.
Since we don'
Hi all,
I'm giving up on the OpenLayers 3 packaging, because packaging Node.js
projects is too painful. There is no acceptable solution to the small
Node.js module bundling problem among others.
The small Node.js modules need to be bundled in other packages because
FTP-master won't accept separat
control 792064 + patch
thanks
On Friday 10 July 2015 20:44:25 Chris West wrote:
> The package fails to build under various conditions,
> including on both of the builders I care about.
In general, I would say that it is not a package's fault: you can come up with
many different ways to have ver
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 792064 + patch
Bug #792064 [src:libuv] FTBFS: tests fail with CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE and without
networking
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
792064: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
tags 792064 + patch
thanks
This applies on top of 0.10.36-2.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso)
: :' : The Universal O.S.| lucab (AT) debian.org
`. `'` | GPG: 0xBB1A3A854F3BBEBF
`- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer
diff
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Luca Bruno wrote:
> However, as this seems to be part of repro-build (which I do care about), you
> can find a patch here that should fix it. Let me know if it works.
Woo, thanks!
> > If you have CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE (e.g. you're running the build as root),
Source: node-oauth
Version: 0.9.11-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid stretch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build when internet connectivity is not available, such as
in pbiulder:
When using the SHA1 Hashing function
Sebastiaan Couwenberg writes:
> Since we don't have an acceptable solution for bundling these small
> Node.js packages, I won't be able to complete the OpenLayers 3
> packaging.
Thanks for expressing that. I'm sorry to learn that policy is a barrier
to your packaging work.
What are the proposal
Ben Finney writes:
> What are the proposals to package small libraries of JavaScript code?
Looking through the archive, I get the impression that one approach which
could work is to collect multiple separate works by some related theme,
and distribute some smaller number of larger, aggregate bin
On 07/13/2015 02:40 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ben Finney writes:
>
>> What are the proposals to package small libraries of JavaScript code?
>
> Looking through the archive, I get the impression that one approach which
> could work is to collect multiple separate works by some related theme,
> and
10 matches
Mail list logo
