[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-reinterval_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:node-reinterval is NEW. binary:node-reinterval is NEW. source:node-reinterval is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-ultron_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:node-ultron is NEW. binary:node-ultron is NEW. source:node-ultron is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-reinterval_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes

node-reinterval_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-reinterval_1.1.0-1.dsc node-reinterval_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz node-reinterval_1.1.0-1.debian.tar.xz node-reinterval_1.1.0-1_all.deb node-reinterval_1.1.0-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings,

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-ultron_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes

node-ultron_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-ultron_1.1.0-1.dsc node-ultron_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz node-ultron_1.1.0-1.debian.tar.xz node-ultron_1.1.0-1_all.deb node-ultron_1.1.0-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-marked-man 0.3.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the node-marked-man source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.2.0-1 Current version: 0.3.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-process 0.11.10-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the node-process source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.11.10-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-is-object_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, the copyright holder in LICENSE does not seem to match the entry in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-ultron_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please mention unshift.io as copyright holder as well. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-reinterval_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, copyright holder in LICENSE seems to be different from the entry in your debian/copyright. This looks wrong. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-callback-stream_1.1.0-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 02:39:45 +0800 Source: node-callback-stream Binary: node-callback-stream Architecture: source all Version: 1.1.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-crypto-browserify_3.11.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please mention crypto-browserify-3.11.0/example/bundle.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- Pkg-javascript-devel

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-path-browserify_0.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, please mention path-browserify-0.0.0/index.js:// Copyright Joyent, Inc. in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-babylon_6.14.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, here at least: babylon-6.14.1/test/fixtures/esprima/LICENSE should appear in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-querystring-es3_0.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, in this package please mention: package/encode.js:// Copyright Joyent, Inc. package/decode.js:// Copyright Joyent, Inc. in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-callback-stream_1.1.0-2_amd64.changes

node-callback-stream_1.1.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-callback-stream_1.1.0-2.dsc node-callback-stream_1.1.0-2.debian.tar.xz node-callback-stream_1.1.0-2_all.deb node-callback-stream_1.1.0-2_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processed (with 1 error): block 832237 with 832237

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 832237 with 832237 Bug #832237 [libjs-mousetrap] libjs-mousetrap: Section should not be “ruby” Failed to set blocking bugs of 832237: It is nonsensical for a bug to block itself (or a merged partner): 832237. > thanks Stopping processing

[Pkg-javascript-devel] coffeescript & node-coffeeify

Hi Jonas, The last package I had sitting in experimental because of the Stretch freeze is node-coffeeify. I looked at moving it to unstable yesterday, but realised that it needs the version of coffeescript that is also sitting in experimental. Is there anything holding up the latest