Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Is anyone maintaining (the ham radio tool) node?

2011-11-06 Thread Jonathan Nieder
(+cc: nod...@packages.debian.org. Sorry for the noise.) Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Patrick Ouellette wrote: >> You claim to not use either package, but yet you advocate for the node.js >> package to keep the executable name "node" - this is strange to me. > > Sorry, I must have been unclear. A few

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Is anyone maintaining (the ham radio tool) node?

2011-11-06 Thread Patrick Ouellette
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 09:20:31PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Hi Pat, > > Patrick Ouellette wrote: > > > The binary on the ham radio side is not "LinuxNode" in package "node" it is > > simply "node" in package "node" > > > > Since you are still concerned with this issue, and neither side

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Is anyone maintaining (the ham radio tool) node?

2011-11-06 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Pat, Patrick Ouellette wrote: > The binary on the ham radio side is not "LinuxNode" in package "node" it is > simply "node" in package "node" > > Since you are still concerned with this issue, and neither side has shown a > willingness to change, I would say the time has come for both packages

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Is anyone maintaining (the ham radio tool) node?

2011-11-06 Thread Patrick Ouellette
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 01:27:42AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Hi, > > In February, I wrote[1]: > > > Both LinuxNode (package "node") and node.js (package "nodejs") are > > designed to be accessed through the command name "node". > [...] > > If there is any way I can help, please feel free

[Pkg-javascript-devel] URGENT.

2011-11-06 Thread Mr. Grover McPherson. (CEO)
We are giving internatioanl Loan to coporate companies and private individuals at a low and affordable interest rate of 3% for 1 year to 30 years duration of the repayment period, with loan amounts ranging from USD 5,000 to USD 5 million. For more details E-mail: kdf.ls...@xyan.us Sent from m

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Resolving "pure" javascript libraries from NodeJS

2011-11-06 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 06/11/2011 22:17, David Paleino wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 22:03:33 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > >> It seems like the package is asking for "wax", which is a >> pure-javascript library, to be used from a web browser, even though it is >> available from npmjs.org. I packaged (correctly, I hope

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Resolving "pure" javascript libraries from NodeJS

2011-11-06 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 22:03:33 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > It seems like the package is asking for "wax", which is a > pure-javascript library, to be used from a web browser, even though it is > available from npmjs.org. I packaged (correctly, I hope) libjs-wax, but this > code horribly fails in No

[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-contextify_0.0.6-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-11-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: node-contextify_0.0.6-2.debian.tar.gz to main/n/node-contextify/node-contextify_0.0.6-2.debian.tar.gz node-contextify_0.0.6-2.dsc to main/n/node-contextify/node-contextify_0.0.6-2.dsc node-contextify_0.0.6-2_i386.deb to main/n/node-contextify/node-contextify_0.0.6-2_i386.deb Ov

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Resolving "pure" javascript libraries from NodeJS

2011-11-06 Thread David Paleino
Hello people, I'm still struggling in packaging a NodeJS application I particularly like, TileMill :) It seems like the package is asking for "wax", which is a pure-javascript library, to be used from a web browser, even though it is available from npmjs.org. I packaged (correctly, I hope) libjs-w

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of node-contextify_0.0.6-2_i386.changes

2011-11-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
node-contextify_0.0.6-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: node-contextify_0.0.6-2.dsc node-contextify_0.0.6-2.debian.tar.gz node-contextify_0.0.6-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) _