Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] wrong build-dependency on libnode-uglify

2012-12-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting David Paleino (2012-12-07 22:21:32) > On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:04:35 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Hi David (and others), > > > > I intend to drop the libnode-uglify package completely, which will > > cause FTBFS for the following packages: > > > > mirror.js > > reqwest > > Not a

[Pkg-javascript-devel] mirror.js_0.3.3-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-12-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:56:54 +0100 Source: mirror.js Binary: node-mirror Architecture: source all Version: 0.3.3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: David Paleino De

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of mirror.js_0.3.3-3_i386.changes

2012-12-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
mirror.js_0.3.3-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mirror.js_0.3.3-3.dsc mirror.js_0.3.3-3.debian.tar.gz node-mirror_0.3.3-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

[Pkg-javascript-devel] reqwest_0.6.0-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-12-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:43:50 +0100 Source: reqwest Binary: libjs-reqwest Architecture: source all Version: 0.6.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By: David Paleino De

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of reqwest_0.6.0-1_i386.changes

2012-12-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
reqwest_0.6.0-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: reqwest_0.6.0-1.dsc reqwest_0.6.0.orig.tar.gz reqwest_0.6.0-1.debian.tar.gz libjs-reqwest_0.6.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] wrong build-dependency on libnode-uglify

2012-12-07 Thread David Paleino
On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:04:35 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi David (and others), > > I intend to drop the libnode-uglify package completely, which will cause > FTBFS for the following packages: > > mirror.js > reqwest Not a FTBFS, since they both use libnode-uglify | node-uglify. The patch

[Pkg-javascript-devel] wrong build-dependency on libnode-uglify

2012-12-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi David (and others), I intend to drop the libnode-uglify package completely, which will cause FTBFS for the following packages: mirror.js reqwest Both packages are are both maintained in this team and I have fixed the issue in git, but I will not upload as they use short-form dh which I am

[Pkg-javascript-devel] backbone_0.9.2-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-12-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:51:38 +0100 Source: backbone Binary: libjs-backbone node-backbone Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers Changed-By:

[Pkg-javascript-devel] Processing of backbone_0.9.2-4_amd64.changes

2012-12-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
backbone_0.9.2-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: backbone_0.9.2-4.dsc backbone_0.9.2-4.debian.tar.gz libjs-backbone_0.9.2-4_all.deb node-backbone_0.9.2-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___

[Pkg-javascript-devel] ok to switch uglifyjs to CDBS?

2012-12-07 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Marcelo (and others), I am looking at uglifyjs and want to do a range of improvements, but am held back by its use of short-form dh. Would you be ok with me switching it to use CDBS? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] New jquery-lazyload version 1.8.0 - please review

2012-12-07 Thread Marcelo Jorge Vieira
Hi Emilien, On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 14:19 -0200, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: > > I had contacted upstream about the licensing of these images, but > > never got an answer and kind of dropped the pressure. > > Bad, I will too. Here [0] is the answer about images license. [0] https://github.com/tuu