Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-tar_1.0.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Did you just hijack node-tar that was already in the archive ? Please contact pkg-javascript and try to coordinate your uploads with this team. Check its wiki, read what npm2deb says about the modules you're packaging. For instance, the team was avoiding node-readable-stream for some reason. It would have been nicer to discuss and get some advices before blindly uploading. Moreover, please, consider to add your contributions to the DB of npm2deb (if needed): https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Database L. -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-tar_1.0.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
On 03/14/2015 11:23 AM, Leo Iannacone wrote: On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote: Did you just hijack node-tar that was already in the archive ? Apparently I fucked that up. I didn't look well enough to see that it was already packaged. I'm sorry about that, and I will revert my upload by restoring the previous version with an epoch unless there is no objection to the 1.0.3 version, then I will merge Jérémys packaging changes back. How do you want to proceed Jérémy? Please contact pkg-javascript and try to coordinate your uploads with this team. Check its wiki, read what npm2deb says about the modules you're packaging. My ITPs and RFPs for the openlayers project all go to the javascript list too. I'm also using the wiki to track the progress: https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/openlayers For such a loosely coordinated team, that seems the best I can do. For instance, the team was avoiding node-readable-stream for some reason. It would have been nicer to discuss and get some advices before blindly uploading. The avoidance of readable stream was not documented, and there was an RFP documenting the need for a package even though the package it was originally needed for didn't require it anymore. I'm happy that I'm finally getting some feedback even though its triggered by a fuckup of mine, at least there is some dialog going. Please give more advice for the packages in the openlayers dependency chain. Moreover, please, consider to add your contributions to the DB of npm2deb (if needed): https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Database Interesting page, but not very informative. And also not linked from the Nodejs page, making it not very easily discoverable. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] npm2deb database
Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2015-03-14 13:38:20) On 03/14/2015 11:23 AM, Leo Iannacone wrote: please, consider to add your contributions to the DB of npm2deb (if needed): https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Database Interesting page, but not very informative. And also not linked from the Nodejs page, making it not very easily discoverable. I have no interest in npm2deb. Those relying on that wiki page please elaborate what maintenance is needed, and let us discuss if sensible to generally expect from us all to do that, and how (perhaps better to use e.g. debian/upstream/* YAML data for that). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Communication issues? (Was: node-tar_1.0.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable)
Hi David (and others, Quoting David Prévot (2015-03-14 15:33:15) Le 14/03/2015 08:38, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit : I'm happy that I'm finally getting some feedback even though its triggered by a fuckup of mine, at least there is some dialog going. I’ve been subscribed to this list for almost two years now, and unfortunately, it seems like there is not much positive feedback or help one can expect from here. Not sure how we (or more realistically you, since I’m pretty tired of the mud-throwing style of discussion here) may improve the current status, be more welcoming and helpful to each other, but believe there is room for improvement. I appreciate this list - it is far better than not having it: I have found it helpful for coordination of packaging efforts. I agree that our style and amount of dialogue can be improved, and welcome efforts towards that. Maybe a face to face meeting would help starting back on the right foot? The upcoming DebConf (and DebCamp) may be a good opportunity, so please, do register [1] and propose a team sprint [2] or at least an event [3] if you believe this can help. I will attend the upcoming Debconf + Debcamp, and would be happy to meet face to face then (but not all of Debcamp - I am involved quite a few places). I will also try make a better job of responding here on the list - reason I have often kept silent is to not bother with my arguably odd cdbs packaging style (I assume most here use short-form dh and - like myself - dislike embracing multiple styles). @David: Will you initiate a sprint for us at Debcamp? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
