Your message dated Sun, 29 Jan 2017 07:04:56 +
with message-id
<1485673496.438276.863023496.78483...@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line (Closing duplicate)
has caused the Debian Bug report #853036,
regarding node-liftoff: Non-determistically FTBFS due to unreliable timing in
tests
Source: node-liftoff
Version: 2.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
node-liftoff's testsuite appears to use method timing/benchm
Source: node-liftoff
Version: 2.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
node-liftoff's testsuite appears to use method timing/benchm
https://git.fosscommunity.in/AkashSarda/hoek
I have packaged, ran sbuild, and it is linitan error free.
Please review and upload.
Bug No. 850238.
Yours Sincerely
Akash Sarda
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin
On ശനി 28 ജനുവരി 2017 10:21 വൈകു, Ross Gammon wrote:
> I was disappointed with this too. I think we should be encouraging
> newcomers to place their packaging in the standard place, so we can help
> them when required. The last thing we want is node-*/js packaging being
> done in a different way, i
2017-01-28 17:46 GMT+01:00 Ross Gammon :
> On 01/28/2017 10:52 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
>> This is a good idea ! There is a lot of cruft, especially packages created
>> for some obscure reason 2-3 years ago and since then abandoned both by the
>> maintainer and by upstream, and superseded by the n
Hi Pirate,
On 01/27/2017 10:02 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Thanks to a bug in npm2deb search which does not look in experimental
> and our excellent on boarding practices which prefers keeping new git
> repos out of team repo in alioth, people are duplicating work, packaging
> already packaged nod
On 01/28/2017 10:52 AM, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> This is a good idea ! There is a lot of cruft, especially packages created
> for some obscure reason 2-3 years ago and since then abandoned both by the
> maintainer and by upstream, and superseded by the next cool thing in the
> nodejs ecosystem.
>
>
I have packaged "node-is-plain-obj" (dependency of AVA). I have made
it lintian-clean and
have tested it using sbuild.
It is available on the repository:
https://git.fosscommunity.in/tushar/node-is-plain-obj.git
I would like to have it sponsored!
Thank you for your valuable time!
--
Pkg-javasc
binary:node-duplexer3 is NEW.
binary:node-duplexer3 is NEW.
source:node-duplexer3 is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be
node-cli-spinners is already in Debian:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/node-cli-spinners
It is currently only in experimental, please talk to the maintainer
(added in Cc) in case you require the package in unstable.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly
node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1.dsc
node-duplexer3_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz
node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1.debian.tar.xz
node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1_all.deb
node-duplexer3_0.1.4-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your De
On ശനി 28 ജനുവരി 2017 04:28 വൈകു, Tushar Agey wrote:
> tests are enabled in debian/tests/control
Thanks! Uploaded.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailm
binary:node-widest-line is NEW.
binary:node-widest-line is NEW.
source:node-widest-line is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so ple
node-widest-line_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-widest-line_1.0.0-1.dsc
node-widest-line_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz
node-widest-line_1.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz
node-widest-line_1.0.0-1_all.deb
node-widest-line_1.0.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
On വെള്ളി 27 ജനുവരി 2017 08:57 വൈകു, Tushar Agey wrote:
> I have packaged "node-duplexer3". I have made it lintian-clean and
> have tested
> it using sbuild.
>
> It is available on the repository:
>
> https://git.fosscommunity.in/tushar/node-duplexer3.git
>
> I would like to have it sponsored!
>
On വെള്ളി 27 ജനുവരി 2017 09:02 വൈകു, Tushar Agey wrote:
> I have packaged "node-widest-line". I have made it lintian-clean and
> have tested
> it using sbuild.
>
> It is available on the repository:
>
> https://git.fosscommunity.in/tushar/node-widest-line.git
>
> I would like to have it sponsore
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # just for the BTS graph
> found 699482 1.4.2-2
Bug #699482 {Done: Paul Gevers } [jquery] CVE-2011-4969:
jQuery 1.6.2 XSS
There is no source info for the package 'jquery' at version '1.4.2-2' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version
This is a good idea ! There is a lot of cruft, especially packages created for
some obscure reason 2-3 years ago and since then abandoned both by the
maintainer and by upstream, and superseded by the next cool thing in the nodejs
ecosystem.
I propose to extract from UDD a list of candidate pack
Quoting Ben Finney (2017-01-28 03:07:01)
> Jérémy Lal writes:
>
> > - or having a reverse (build-)dependency, or what's the point ?
>
> I am very much in favour of this: node libraries should be in Debian
> to provide a library that is needed for some actual program of benefit
> to Debian user
Source: dojo
Version: 1.11.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170128 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
21 matches
Mail list logo