This was caused by the upload of node-marked 0.3.9+dfsg-1
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
node-marked-man_0.3.0-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-marked-man_0.3.0-2.dsc
node-marked-man_0.3.0-2.debian.tar.xz
node-marked-man_0.3.0-2_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
Pkg-
Hi
This situation seems to get worse with each new version of nodejs.
In Ubuntu, where autopkgtests are run for every release architecture,
node-liftoff failed on armhf [1] and arm64 [2] since the upload of
nodejs 8.9.3.
We resorted to increasing the timeout from 5000 to 1 in
debian/rules an
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2018 17:39:04 +0200
Source: node-marked-man
Binary: node-marked-man
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Changed-By: Jérémy
[Resending including 853...@bugs.debian.org in CC this time..]
Hi Graham,
Thanks for the followup.
> Chris, you wrote "...the test would still be unreliable whatever value
> you choose", can you propose something other than increasing the
> timeout?
Well, just to be 100% clear, I don't propose
Your message dated Sat, 07 Apr 2018 16:21:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#891736: fixed in node-marked-man 0.3.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #891736,
regarding node-marked-man FTBFS: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi Chris
On 7 April 2018 at 18:22, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Well, just to be 100% clear, I don't propose increasing the timeout at
> all: I'm pretty hardcode on tests being determinstic so merely increasing
> the wait time feels especially gross to me. :)
Would you please explain your objection to ti
Hi Graham,
> > I'm pretty hardcore on tests being determinstic, so merely increasing
> > the wait time feels especially gross to me. :)
>
> Would you please explain your objection to timeouts in tests?
Well, we should probably separate the cases of using /timing/ in tests as
part of, say, checki
node-ip 1.1.5-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-04-09
It is affected by these RC bugs:
892658: node-ip: node-ip FTBFS with mocha 4.0.1-3
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-j
