[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency
[re-adding bugreport]] Quoting Pirate Praveen (2016-11-29 06:56:23) > On 2016, നവംബർ 29 10:05:58 AM IST, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>Cannot build the new uglifyjs until bug#846076 is resolved. > > This is now fixed. How? Please elaborate! Checking now with freshly updated unstable+incoming archives and it still fails to satisfy dependencies. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency
On 2016, നവംബർ 29 10:05:58 AM IST, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >Cannot build the new uglifyjs until bug#846076 is resolved. This is now fixed. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2016-11-29 05:26:39) > Seems to me that a simple chmod command is the right thing to use. I > do that now, and try release the package - but you are quite welcome > to suggest other approaches, or adapt the package yourself. Cannot build the new uglifyjs until bug#846076 is resolved. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency
Quoting Pirate Praveen (2016-11-28 11:32:00) > Control: block -1 by 846076 > > On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:08:15 +0530 Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > yargs is in NEW and we can upload a new version once it is accepted. > > > Hi Jonas, > > I have prepared the package in git and it is almost ready for upload. > Can you review and fix these two warnings and upload it? > > W: node-uglify: manpage-has-useless-whatis-entry > usr/share/man/man1/uglifyjs.1.gz > W: node-uglify: script-not-executable > usr/lib/nodejs/uglify-js/bin/extract-props.js > > I'm not too familiar with cdbs, on plain debhelper I could use dh_fixperms CDBS runs dh_fixperms. This line in dbian/rules instructs dh_fixparms to skip nodejs library path, if that is what you wanted to do: DEB_FIXPERMS_EXCLUDE_node-uglify = usr/lib/nodejs I don't follow how dh_fixperms is relevant here, however: I believe dh_fixperms can only be told to _skip_ fixing some permissions, not be educated to e.g. treat /usr/lib/* same as /usr/bin. Seems to me that a simple chmod command is the right thing to use. I do that now, and try release the package - but you are quite welcome to suggest other approaches, or adapt the package yourself. Thanks for all your great work! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency
Control: block -1 by 846076 On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:08:15 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > yargs is in NEW and we can upload a new version once it is accepted. > Hi Jonas, I have prepared the package in git and it is almost ready for upload. Can you review and fix these two warnings and upload it? W: node-uglify: manpage-has-useless-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man1/uglifyjs.1.gz W: node-uglify: script-not-executable usr/lib/nodejs/uglify-js/bin/extract-props.js I'm not too familiar with cdbs, on plain debhelper I could use dh_fixperms Thanks Praveen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency
Control: tags -1 pending On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:24:44 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I can understand how might have seen the clues as being "right around > the corner". yargs is in NEW and we can upload a new version once it is accepted. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency
Quoting Pirate Praveen (2016-11-23 08:37:39) > On Tuesday 22 November 2016 10:53 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Ah, I understand you now: You present breakage when using code not in >> Debian. Quite confusing - please *always* mention explicitly in >> bugports when using non-Debian packages! > > Sorry, that was mostly meant a self note (I should have explicitly > mentioned it). > > I ran uscan, imported the new upstream release, built the package and > got the error when running it. Makes sense (now that I what sense to make of it) :-) >> I only asked whether or not it was related - I did not imply it was >> not. >> >> I was genuinely confused by your terse writing style. >> >> Another point of confusion was that a different topic was used in the >> email than in original bugreport topic. I was unaware (until digging >> into archive, when in above latest post you still didn't elaborate >> much) that was a wishlist bug, so assumed that your presenting code >> failing was to be treated seriously. >> >> >> With the best of intentions, > > Sorry about doubting your intentions, but that came as a result of so > much comments on -devel about packaging so many tiny node modules. > Since you already commented before to start with packaging yargs I > thought it would be enough. I can understand how might have seen the clues as being "right around the corner". Keepup the good work, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#836722: Bug#836722: Bug#836722: needs yargs as a dependency
On Tuesday 22 November 2016 10:53 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Ah, I understand you now: You present breakage when using code not in > Debian. Quite confusing - please *always* mention explicitly in > bugports when using non-Debian packages! Sorry, that was mostly meant a self note (I should have explicitly mentioned it). I ran uscan, imported the new upstream release, built the package and got the error when running it. > I only asked whether or not it was related - I did not imply it was not. > > I was genuinely confused by your terse writing style. > > Another point of confusion was that a different topic was used in the > email than in original bugreport topic. I was unaware (until digging > into archive, when in above latest post you still didn't elaborate much) > that was a wishlist bug, so assumed that your presenting code failing > was to be treated seriously. > > > With the best of intentions, Sorry about doubting your intentions, but that came as a result of so much comments on -devel about packaging so many tiny node modules. Since you already commented before to start with packaging yargs I thought it would be enough. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel