On തിങ്കള് 12 ഡിസംബര് 2016 03:08 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Can someone push this through ? The more I think about it the more I am
> convinced that node-emoji is OK
I had to fix filename in pristine-tar branch to get it to build. I have
uploaded it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
On 03/12/2016 16:49, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> On 03/12/2016 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On ശനി 03 ഡിസംബര് 2016 06:46 രാവിലെ, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> Bad move :)
>>> What if a module is named "emoji" ? Then you'll have node-emoji
>>> conflict with it.
>>> node-node-emoji is the right name here.
>>
>
On 03/12/2016 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On ശനി 03 ഡിസംബര് 2016 06:46 രാവിലെ, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> Bad move :)
>> What if a module is named "emoji" ? Then you'll have node-emoji
>> conflict with it.
>> node-node-emoji is the right name here.
>
> I think this is over engineering. We add node-
On ശനി 03 ഡിസംബര് 2016 06:46 രാവിലെ, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Bad move :)
> What if a module is named "emoji" ? Then you'll have node-emoji
> conflict with it.
> node-node-emoji is the right name here.
I think this is over engineering. We add node- prefix so we can have the
same library in other langu
2016-12-03 1:54 GMT+01:00 Paolo Greppi :
> Hi,
>
> I packaged node-emoji as per this ITP:
> https://bugs.debian.org/846212, this is the repo:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-emoji.git
>
> The package name was proposed by npm2deb as node-node-emoji but I like
> node-emoji better
