[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#893515: digikam: FTBFS with kdepim 17.12.2

2018-04-08 Thread Steve Robbins
On Sunday, April 8, 2018 1:25:42 PM CDT Simon Frei wrote:
> I totally understand that, I am just trying to get infos to you as
> debian maintainer from my (at the moment admittedly almost non-existing)
> involvement upstream. Exiv2 0.26 will likely not get into testing.
> Upstream does backport a lot of security fixes to 0.26, but negated
> creating a dot release on request, and is focussing on 0.27. It was
> planned to release an rc in early 2018, but from what I read in the
> issue tracker, that's not going to happen asap.

Yes, fair enough.   I'm not entirely opposed to patching digikam to accept the 
older exiv2.  That was going to be my Plan B in any case, but you make a good 
case to do it immediately and work on updating exiv2 in parallel.

-S
 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras

[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#893515: digikam: FTBFS with kdepim 17.12.2

2018-04-08 Thread Simon Frei
I totally understand that, I am just trying to get infos to you as
debian maintainer from my (at the moment admittedly almost non-existing)
involvement upstream. Exiv2 0.26 will likely not get into testing.
Upstream does backport a lot of security fixes to 0.26, but negated
creating a dot release on request, and is focussing on 0.27. It was
planned to release an rc in early 2018, but from what I read in the
issue tracker, that's not going to happen asap.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras

[Pkg-kde-extras] HI

2018-04-08 Thread Sgt Farley Andrex
Can we talk ?

___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras

[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#893515: digikam: FTBFS with kdepim 17.12.2

2018-04-08 Thread Simon Frei
Digikam still works with exiv2 0.25. It's just that a lot of fixes have
gone into 0.26 that prevent crashs in digikam, that's why its cmake file
has a >=0.26 dependency.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras

[Pkg-kde-extras] Processed: tagging 893515

2018-04-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 893515 + pending
Bug #893515 [src:digikam] digikam: FTBFS with kdepim 17.12.2
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
893515: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893515
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras


[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#893515: digikam: FTBFS with kdepim 17.12.2

2018-04-08 Thread Steve Robbins
On Monday, March 19, 2018 10:48:38 AM CDT you wrote:

> digikam 5.6.0-4 can't be compiled with KDE Pim 17.12.2, it failes
> because kcalcore was been refactored to use QDateTime instead of
> KDateTime. 

I have DigiKam 5.9.0 compiled locally and it works.  Unfortunately, it depends 
on exiv2 0.26 that only exists in experimental.  So the digikam upload will 
also be to experimental.

-Steve


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
pkg-kde-extras mailing list
pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras