Re: GpgME C++ / Qt language providers ready for merge?

2016-04-13 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2016-04-13 08:18:44 -0400, Sandro Knauß wrote: >> looks reasonable to me. I'm assuming that in debian, we'd have the >> gpgme1.0 package (maintained by pkg-gnupg-maint) take over the binary >> packages from the gpgmepp souce package (maintained by the Debian Qt/KDE

Re: GpgME C++ / Qt language providers ready for merge?

2016-04-13 Thread Sandro Knauß
Hey, > looks reasonable to me. I'm assuming that in debian, we'd have the > gpgme1.0 package (maintained by pkg-gnupg-maint) take over the binary > packages from the gpgmepp souce package (maintained by the Debian Qt/KDE > maintainers). I've cc'ed both groups on this e-mail so that people are >