Re: Package RKWard in need of sponsor or new maintainer
Hi Thomas, I would recommend you also to contact debian-science team, if you do not find a sponsor. There are some people, which are working on R-packages, so they may be interested in this package also. Also, there should be a lot of people around your place, if you want to reintroduce your GPG-key in Debian keyring. Best regards Anton 2015-12-04 13:44 GMT+01:00 Thomas Friedrichsmeier < thomas.friedrichsme...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>: > Hi! > > I'm upstream developer and debian maintainer of RKWard, a KDE-based > frontend to the R statistics language. RKWard has been included in the > debian archives for more than nine years, and I have been the uploader > as "DM" for more than five years. > > Currently, I cannot upload any new packages because my registered GPG > key is too short (1024 bits). As this is the only package I maintain, > the cost-benefit-ration of getting my new key signed by two DDs seems > prohibitive, ATM. > > Debian has already missed out on one release (0.6.3) of RKWard. Now a > new release is approaching, and I am looking for a solution to get it > uploaded. > > My preferred option for this would actually be to pass on > maintainership to the QT / KDE team. This does not seem entirely out of > scope (to me), as RKWard has moved to the KDE.org umbrella, last year > (some last few bits still dangling on SF.net). While it is still in > "playground" on KDE.org, I expect to submit it to KDE "review", soon, > targetted for inclusion in extragear. > > As a second best option, I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the > upcoming version 0.6.4 to the archive. > > In either case, the most recent debian packaging can be found at > https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=rkward.git&a=tree&f=debian . Note that this > includes support for legacy versions of KDE, R, and debian. The most > important reason for this is that it is also used to auto-build Ubuntu > packages reaching back to "Lucid". This may or may not be a problem to > you, however, if you are thinking about a modernization of the package, > you should be aware that the upcoming release 0.6.4 is rather likely to > be the last KDE 4-based release of RKWard, and with the port to KF5, a > lot of legacy code will fall away, in any case. > > Thanks for your time! > Thomas > > -- > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk > -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: Removing Qt4 in Strech
Hello, thanks for pushing this transition. What do you think, if I have a library, which is now built against qt4, should I just switch to qt5 or create lib-qt5-dev for the transition period? The second question is the problem with armel and armhf qt5-builds. I think it will cause some problems [1] and would like to ask for a solution, which should be applied for all affected packages. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2015/03/msg00233.html Thanks Anton 2015-04-19 19:53 GMT+02:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez : > On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:59:58 you wrote: >> Hi everyone! I have drafted a Qt4-removal announce in gobby, Teams→KDE→Qt4, >> right at the top. > > After some discussing with Dmitry on IRC we decided it would be better to > start announcing Qt4's webkit removal and using that as propaganda for > suggesting people to port their code to Qt5. > > According to dak that would mean ~96 source packages involved. > > I have updated the text in that regard, please give it a read :) > > Thanks, Lisandro. > > -- > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ > http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ > > -- > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: [SCM] Eigen2 packaging branch, upstream, created. debian/2.0.15-1-2-gcb73e65
Hi, Lisandro! Thanks for proposing the help. I have discussed already it with Modestas via irc and made some changes. So, I hope, it will be uploaded soon. Anton 2011/5/29 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer : > On Dom 29 May 2011 07:36:01 Anton Gladky escribió: > [snip] >> I have also prepared 2.0.16-1 version. What is the best way to commit it? > > Hi Anton! I's in the doc. If in doubt, feel free to ask me in debian-qt- > k...@lists.debian.org or on irc, #debian-kde. > > Kinds regards, Lisandro. > > -- > mathematician, n.: > Some one who believes imaginary things appear right before your i's. > > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ > http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ > -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: [SCM] Eigen2 packaging branch, upstream, created. debian/2.0.15-1-2-gcb73e65
Ok, sorry, I did not read that document... May I delete those branches? I have also prepared 2.0.16-1 version. What is the best way to commit it? Thanks Anton On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Hello, > > On sekmadienis 29 Gegužė 2011 10:28:41 Anton Gladky wrote: >> The branch, upstream has been created >> at cb73e65fa1958a3c4382e00c13c1574fdb252e8b (commit) >> >> - Shortlog >> commit cb73e65fa1958a3c4382e00c13c1574fdb252e8b >> Author: Anton Gladky >> Date: Sat May 28 23:56:57 2011 +0200 >> >> Imported Upstream version 2.0.16 >> >> commit 828261c6f4e76b2de15d7f3e08b9dda6612528de >> Author: Anton Gladky >> Date: Sat May 28 23:53:06 2011 +0200 >> >> Imported Upstream version 2.0.15 >> >> --- > > This is not how it works. You can't implement random git workflows while > the package is under Debian Qt/KDE team maintenance. Please stick to [1]. > > [1] > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-kde/qt/qt4-x11.git;a=blob;f=debian/README.source > > -- > Modestas Vainius > -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: RFS: eigen3
Ok, done. Please, remove http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/krap/eigen3.git Thank you. Anton -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: RFS: eigen3
Hi, all seems, debian-science team is interested in uploading and maintaining this package. Is it ok for everybody? Also after some discussions in debian-science, I propose to pass over eigen2 under debian-science, because there can be more interest in it. What do you think? Thanks. Anton On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > I have updated it according to suggestions. > > Anton > -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: RFS: eigen3
I have updated it according to suggestions. Anton -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
Re: RFS: eigen3
Ok, thanks for suggestions.
Anton
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On antradienis 26 Balandis 2011 21:52:51 Anton Gladky wrote:
>> Dear kde users and maintainers,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eigen3".
>>
>> * Package name : eigen3
>> Version : 3.0.0-1
>> * URL : http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/
>> * License : GPL-2+ or LGPL-3.0+
>> Section : libdevel
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> libeigen3-dev - lightweight C++ template library for linear algebra
>> libeigen3-doc - eigen3 API docmentation
>>
>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>>
>> The package can be found on git-repository [1]
>> - URL: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/krap/eigen3.git
>>
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Generally our interest in eigen3 is very very low. We are forced to maintain
> eigen2 since KDE needs it. But at the moment KDE does not need eigen3 so we
> are very slow to respond to your calls for sponsorship or review.
>
> I've just looked at your debian/rules. You seem to use dh in a very odd non-
> standard way. dh is typically used as a sequencer for "minimal rules" +
> overrides so please stick to that. Also dh would allow you to get rid of
> stamping clutter. What's more, ${BUILDDIR} does not seem like makefile syntax.
> debian/Changelog_upstream looks odd too as it's something that upstream should
> maintain rather than debian maintainer.
>
> If we ever have to care about eigen3, the packaging should be as simple as
> possible. Currently I'm not sure I really like what I see in debian/rules
> alone (haven't looked elsewhere). debian/rules could be reduced to ~10 lines
> without too much effort.
>
> --
> Modestas Vainius
>
--
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
RFS: eigen3
Dear kde users and maintainers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eigen3". * Package name: eigen3 Version : 3.0.0-1 * URL : http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/ * License : GPL-2+ or LGPL-3.0+ Section : libdevel It builds these binary packages: libeigen3-dev - lightweight C++ template library for linear algebra libeigen3-doc - eigen3 API docmentation The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on git-repository [1] - URL: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/krap/eigen3.git I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Anton Gladky -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
