thanks for pushing this transition. What do you think, if I
have a library, which is now built against qt4, should I just
switch to qt5 or create lib-qt5-dev for the transition period?

The second question is the problem with armel and armhf
qt5-builds. I think it will cause some problems [1] and would
like to ask for a solution, which should be applied for all affected

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2015/03/msg00233.html



2015-04-19 19:53 GMT+02:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez <perezme...@gmail.com>:
> On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:59:58 you wrote:
>> Hi everyone! I have drafted a Qt4-removal announce in gobby, Teams→KDE→Qt4,
>> right at the top.
> After some discussing with Dmitry on IRC we decided it would be better to
> start announcing Qt4's webkit removal and using that as propaganda for
> suggesting people to port their code to Qt5.
> According to dak that would mean ~96 source packages involved.
> I have updated the text in that regard, please give it a read :)
> Thanks, Lisandro.
> --
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
> http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
> --
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk


Reply via email to