Hello, thanks for pushing this transition. What do you think, if I have a library, which is now built against qt4, should I just switch to qt5 or create lib-qt5-dev for the transition period?
The second question is the problem with armel and armhf qt5-builds. I think it will cause some problems [1] and would like to ask for a solution, which should be applied for all affected packages. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2015/03/msg00233.html Thanks Anton 2015-04-19 19:53 GMT+02:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez <perezme...@gmail.com>: > On Thursday 16 April 2015 15:59:58 you wrote: >> Hi everyone! I have drafted a Qt4-removal announce in gobby, Teams→KDE→Qt4, >> right at the top. > > After some discussing with Dmitry on IRC we decided it would be better to > start announcing Qt4's webkit removal and using that as propaganda for > suggesting people to port their code to Qt5. > > According to dak that would mean ~96 source packages involved. > > I have updated the text in that regard, please give it a read :) > > Thanks, Lisandro. > > -- > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ > http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ > > -- > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk