Then I think we have consensus :-D
Just one note on my side:
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 08:51:29 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
[snip]
> > And that also means that if someone uploaded something which should have
> > not been uploaded you will not cherry pick that change into our branches,
> > so that's totally
2015-05-22 18:19 GMT+03:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez :
>> I was planning to follow mesa
>> (http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-xorg/lib/mesa.git) way of using eg
>> ubuntu and ubuntu+1 branches.
>
> With my "I really don't understand much of how ubuntu works" hat on I like the
> idea with minor
Hey,
On Fri, 22 May 2015 12:19:21 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez wrote:
> On Friday 22 May 2015 17:26:18 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Let's discuss this here. At least mitya57 has wished for Ubuntu's Qt
>> packaging to from Launchpad to Debian git, similar to how Kubuntu
>> (Ubuntu's KDE
On Friday 22 May 2015 17:26:18 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let's discuss this here. At least mitya57 has wished for Ubuntu's Qt
> packaging to from Launchpad to Debian git, similar to how Kubuntu
> (Ubuntu's KDE flavor) has moved KDE packaging to Debian git branches.
> Lisandro however wanted to
Hi,
Let's discuss this here. At least mitya57 has wished for Ubuntu's Qt
packaging to from Launchpad to Debian git, similar to how Kubuntu
(Ubuntu's KDE flavor) has moved KDE packaging to Debian git branches.
Lisandro however wanted to discuss this more formally and I agree.
I did a couple of cle
